Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VanDeKoik
Well then you know what? Cruz should do NOTHING on this.

Let it sit. Wave around how he augured cases before SCOTUS, and that will make it settled?

I don't necessarily disagree. But, assuming Cruz does want to settle this matter, he needs to wait until a proper defendant is identified.

With this type of declaratory judgment, it's not enough to tell a court - look, I think someone, somewhere might sue me in court and test my eligibility at some time.

Now, if a secretary of state or a board of election somewhere indicated they were going to keep him off the ballot that may be enough for the suit to proceed. Or, a regular joe or political operative who tells the press they are lawyered up and ready to file suit.

In other words, there needs to be a clear indication suit will be filed against him on this matter and/or that he is in actual danger of being kept off a ballot in a place he would otherwise be qualified.

118 posted on 01/07/2016 11:43:03 AM PST by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: gdani

you are right, this declaratory judgment will NOT stop the likes of Alan Grayson and so on.....and it may backfire. Nothing to gain, lot to lose......he’s doing the smarter thing.


121 posted on 01/07/2016 11:49:30 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again (Amazon Best Seller))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson