To: simpson96
Not sure what the age of consent is in Arizona but aren’t they supposed to be charging the boy with statutory rape?
To: SmokingJoe
Now if they are close in age because you might have to also charge the little tramp.
27 posted on
01/07/2016 7:20:47 AM PST by
AppyPappy
(If you really want to irritate someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
To: SmokingJoe
29 posted on
01/07/2016 7:21:20 AM PST by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: SmokingJoe
Age of consent is 18 in Arizona, but there is a legal defense against prosecution in this scenario:
It is a defense to a prosecution pursuant to section 13-1405 if the victim is fifteen, sixteen or seventeen years of age, the defendant is under nineteen years of age or attending high school and is no more than twenty-four months older than the victim and the conduct is consensual.
44 posted on
01/07/2016 7:29:02 AM PST by
Anitius Severinus Boethius
(www.wilsonharpbooks.com - Sign up for my new release e-mail and get my first novel for free)
To: SmokingJoe
Not sure what the age of consent is in Arizona but aren’t they supposed to be charging the boy with statutory rape?
Then the girl should be charged also since the boy was 16
50 posted on
01/07/2016 7:33:53 AM PST by
uncbob
To: SmokingJoe
Not sure what the age of consent is in Arizona but aren’t they supposed to be charging the boy with statutory rape?
Both kids were 16 years old according to the article. If the boy gets charged with statutory rape, the girl should also be charged with it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson