Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Carpenter: The Really Precarious Thing About Trump’s Birther Claims
Conservative Review ^ | January 6th, 2016 | Amanda Carpenter

Posted on 01/06/2016 8:20:35 PM PST by Isara

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last
To: Yosemitest

My comment was in regard to what the FRAMERS or Article II considered as a natural born citizen. THAT understanding has NOT been modified by an Article V amendment, which is the ONLY way that it can constitutionally be done, and NEVER by a statute. Even then, the Cable Act only made him a STATUTE citizen, and the nations of Canada and Cuba still had a internationally recognized claim on his allegiance, which can never be true of an NBC from birth.


41 posted on 01/06/2016 9:41:24 PM PST by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Isara

The thing is, if Trump were to say no more on the subject, Cruz would still be forced to talk about it for the next 3 months, at least.


42 posted on 01/06/2016 9:42:14 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Isara

The relevant law, as Mark Levin was explaining this evening, is the Nationalities Act of 1940. It says that if you’re born to a mother who is an American citizen and lived 10 years in the United States, at least 5 of them over the age of 14, you’re a natural-born citizen, no matter where you’re born.

Cruz’s mother meets that criterion, even though they were in Calgary at the time of Ted’s birth.

The reason that the place of 0bama’s birth mattes is that his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was only 18 when he was born, and therefore could not have lived in the US for 5 years over the age of 14. Thus, he’s a natural-born citizen if born in Hawaii, but not if he was born in Kenya.


43 posted on 01/06/2016 9:53:51 PM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DMZFrank
You ARE WRONG !
Do you NOT BELIEVE that SECTION 5 of the Constitution of the United States is NOT PART OF the United States CONSTITUTION ?
How STUPID can you get ?

FACT: Cruz’s father’s Cuban nationality at the time of Cruz’s birth, is irrelevant, according to the law at that time,
just so long as he was a LEGAL Immigrant at the time of Ted Cruz's birth,
AND both of Ted Cruz's parents were legally married to each other. So there is the law for the time Ted Cruz was born,
AND HOW Ted Cruz's PARENTS fulfilled ALL those requirements of the law that time, for Ted Cruz to be a "Natural Born Citizen".
Ted Cruz did NOT NEED a Court and a Judge to "Nationalize" him.
44 posted on 01/06/2016 9:54:07 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Based on the law, he’s wrong.


45 posted on 01/06/2016 9:55:39 PM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
With Trump, what you see is what you get.

No, that would be Cruz, the most consistent candidate in this field.

Trump flip-flops like a garden variety politician.

46 posted on 01/06/2016 9:58:34 PM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest; DMZFrank
"BUT IN THIS CASE, The LAW IS the LAW, and it is VERY CLEAR."

I'm not certain that it is. Certainly the NBC Clause has never been adjudicated, nor has Congress passed any statute indicating the meaning in Article II.

47 posted on 01/06/2016 10:02:01 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Isara; Jane Long; RitaOK; HarleyLady27; DoughtyOne; BlackFemaleArmyCaptain; Bushbacker1; ...
What the enemedia is leaving out in EVERY segment attacking Trump on this Cruz birther issue is that TRUMP DIDN'T BRING THE SUBJECT UP, IT WAS BROUGHT UP BY A REPORTER IN AN INTERVIEW and Trump answered, in short, that the subject should be discussed and looked into.....and it is!

Period!

(With all the fake and selective reportage, sometimes I feel like those guys in the white suits with the little shovels and dustpans at the very end of the horse-laden Rose Bowl Parade).

Leni

48 posted on 01/06/2016 10:08:31 PM PST by MinuteGal ("We will take things away from you on behalf of the common good"...Karl Marx...oops, Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Do you NOT BELIEVE that SECTION 5 of the Constitution of the United States is NOT PART OF the United States CONSTITUTION ?
How STUPID can you get ?

FACT: Cruz’s father’s Cuban nationality at the time of Cruz’s birth, is irrelevant, according to the law at that time,
just so long as he was a LEGAL Immigrant at the time of Ted Cruz's birth,
AND both of Ted Cruz's parents were legally married to each other. Or, a better question:
It really does NOT MATTER WHAT you believe.
THE LAW IS ... THE LAW !
49 posted on 01/06/2016 10:09:10 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Isara

The media would love to have two Republicans get into a verbal tug of war. They have been wringing their hands on how they can do it. If they can get something started, that makes the Republicans look like fools. They want the Republicans to do it to each other. That way they don’t have to get their hands dirty.


50 posted on 01/06/2016 10:13:55 PM PST by jonrick46 (The Left has a mental disorder: A totalitarian mindset..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

I am a Cruz first guy.

Does anyone here think if he gets the nomination that the media and the dems will let this issue stand and just go away nicey nice?>>>> and i think that is what d is saying. the dem layers will litigate this to the end of the earth.


51 posted on 01/06/2016 10:14:17 PM PST by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone Commentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing

LOL!


52 posted on 01/06/2016 10:17:00 PM PST by Flick Lives (One should not attend even the end of the world without a good breakfast. -- Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

Eventually this is going to be litigated, either by Jeb Bush or Hillary Clinton (or her replacement.) We shall see what the judge has to say. Until that point, all of us, from all walks of life, are just expressing our opinions. My personal opinion is based on the Article II, Section I, Clause 5, and there is a reasonable chance that a sympathetic judge, or a strict constructionist, will base his/her opinion based on what the constitution says as well. I think the smart thing to do is not to take the chance of giving the nomination to Jeb Bush, and vote for a candidate who meets the constitutional requirements for the office. Basically, that means do not vote for Rubio or Cruz.


53 posted on 01/06/2016 10:18:09 PM PST by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
Why would you call me stupid? It doesn't seem appropriate to the circumstances.

While I recognize the provisions of the 14th you cite, I don't see where Congress has the authority to supersede the Constitution.

Certainly it's possible to use Section 5 of Amendment 14 to make the case Cruz is NBC.

It's also possible to make a case based on original intent that he is not.

I am not educated enough of the matter to know, with certainty, either way.

And, the nation has never adjudicated the meaning of NBC in Article II.

It's almost certain to go to the Federal courts without regard to what any of us say here on FR.

And it's likely to be the principal subject Cruz deals with until he gets some sort of declarative judgement.

54 posted on 01/06/2016 10:22:55 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Isara

trump is a concern troll.


55 posted on 01/06/2016 10:22:58 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

No, it is your ignorance showing. Cruz’ father and mother were living in CANADA not the USA; Cruz was born in Canada. Cruz’ family moved to the US when Cruz was four years old. At that time, Mr. Cruz senior became a legal immigrant to the USA.


56 posted on 01/06/2016 10:24:38 PM PST by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: erkelly
READ THE LAW and honor THE LAW.
No matter how loud or how long you keep typing your LIE, TED CRUZ IS A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN OF THE UNTIED STATES, ACCORDING TO THE LAW AT THE TIME OF HIS BIRTH.

How much are the "ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS" PAYING YOU to keep typing your LIES ?
57 posted on 01/06/2016 10:30:08 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
It does NOT NEED TO BE "adjudicated"!
The LAW is VERY CLEAR !
58 posted on 01/06/2016 10:32:15 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives; mkjessup; Isara

I didn’t think mkjessup could top his earlier mock graphic of that tired polka dot chart. It was the one with Trump’s checklist filled with nothing but American flags.

But this one with Jim Robinson was just perfect!


59 posted on 01/06/2016 10:32:28 PM PST by Vision Thing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Why are Ted Cruz’s records sealed against Freedom of information Act inquiries? What is he hiding?

is it perhaps that his mother renounced her American citizenship to become a Canadian citizen like her husband? A renounced American citizenship can never be reclaimed. Let Ted open his records and disprove the allegations that he is hiding something.


60 posted on 01/06/2016 10:34:59 PM PST by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson