Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlackAdderess
Because Iowa picked Santorum last time and Huckabee the time before?!

That's true, but it does not really make the point. Santorum and Huckabee went no where because they were NEVER EVER going to be anything more than just niche evangelical candidates. There is no way either man was ever going to have broad national appeal. Trump or Cruz will win Iowa it appears - and when they do, they will be broad appeal candidates.

In the long run, we don't know if Iowa and NH will be significant THIS go round.....the fact that they weren't in 08 and 12 doesn't mean they may not be this time. I think Iowa is more important, given how liberal NH is.

14 posted on 01/06/2016 2:16:45 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again (Amazon Best Seller))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: C. Edmund Wright

I’m an evangelical, but I wouldn’t vote for Santorum or Huckabee. I do like Trump, he’s run a successful national campaign on the cheap, and he understands economics in a way that no other candidate in either party does. Cruz is a popular guy, but I wouldn’t vote for him either, he talks a lot but I don’t see that translating into executive ability.


17 posted on 01/06/2016 2:40:19 AM PST by BlackAdderess (Proud member of the "vulgar unwashed masses")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: C. Edmund Wright

>> I think Iowa is more important, given how liberal NH is.

Iowa’s pretty darn liberal too, in a populist, drunk-on-corn-squeezin’s sort of way. If you get my drift.


18 posted on 01/06/2016 2:43:45 AM PST by Nervous Tick (There is no "allah" but satan, and mohammed was his demon-possessed tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson