Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VinL

Already been addressed. Trump should worry about Trump.


3 posted on 01/05/2016 3:34:32 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The Ghost of FReepers Past; cripplecreek

I put this in “Breaking News”— Evidently,. Santorum saying Cruz is for amnesty is Breaking News, but Trump saying Cruz isn’t eligible for President is not—

Don’t know what’s going on at FR...


13 posted on 01/05/2016 3:40:24 PM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, then to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

Yes, he’s worried the crowds he speaks to keep getting bigger....


27 posted on 01/05/2016 3:45:17 PM PST by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man a subject")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

it took Ted Cruz a long time to renounce his Canadian citizenship. Good thing he wasn’t born in Mexico.


38 posted on 01/05/2016 3:47:20 PM PST by sunrise_sunset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Already been addressed.

Ad Nauseum. A Nothing Burger.

64 posted on 01/05/2016 3:51:55 PM PST by TADSLOS (A Ted Cruz Happy Warrior! GO TED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

“Already been addressed.”

Not in the general public. Best to get this over with early.


74 posted on 01/05/2016 3:55:52 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Already been addressed. Trump should worry about Trump.

Not by the courts. Natural born citizenship has never formally been defined by the courts. They're still using a false one to get illegal alien kids natural born status just because they're born here. Only in the imagination of people like Mark Levin has this been settled, who have not proven themselves to be very objective when dealing with the candidates they favor.

86 posted on 01/05/2016 3:59:31 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

Had Cruz been born in 1933 under the identical birth circumstances that he was born into in 1970, than he would not even have been a US citizen. The Cable Act, passed in 1934, allowed a US citizen woman, married to a foreign national and who gives birth in a foreign country, to transmit US citizenship onto the newborn child for the first time.

Article II, Section I clause 5, was ratified in 1791 with the rest of the constitution, long before the Cable Act.. Article I has not been modified by any subsequent amendment. Accordingly, the original intent and meaning of Article II stands absent any such constitutional amendment.

The purpose of Article II, Section I clause 5 was to prevent undue foreign influence on the office of the presidency, PARTICULARLY thru a father owing allegiance to a foreign sovereignty. The framers took their definition for NBC from Emmerich De Vattel’s Law of Nations, the 212th paragraph of which was quoted in it’s entirety in the 1814 Venus Merchantman decision. The Law of Nations is referred to in Article I of the constitution. That definition referred to an NBC as being born of two citizen parents and born on the soil of the nation. That definition was cited in the 1868 case of Minor vs Hapersett, and Wong Kim Ark vs US. De Vattel has been cited and accepted in dozens of SCOTUS and federal lower court rulings.

The authors of the 14th amendment, Senators Howard Jacob and Rep. Bingham also defined an NBC in similar terms.

Obama is the very embodiment and personification of the REASON that the framers put those protections into the constitution. By ignoring it, we have opened ourselves to the anti American and unconstitutional tyranny that Obama poses to our constitutional republic.

Ted Cruz is head and shoulders the best candidate in the race. He is a patriot who loves this country and it’s people. He is intellectually and philosophically superior to ANYONE else in the race. As much as I admire him, He CANNOT be considered a natural born citizen, as he is a citizen by statute. He was born with THREE countries (The US, Canada, and Cuba thru his father) having a legitimate claim on his allegiance from birth, whether he wanted it or not. I believe in the constitution and the rule of law, NOT in the cult of personality.


322 posted on 01/05/2016 8:37:18 PM PST by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

I don’t think Cruz has to worry.

Cruz crowds:

http://s3.amazonaws.com/media.wbur.org/wordpress/11/files/2015/03/0323_cruz-624x480.jpg

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/93/91/31/93913114b964330915335b9cb2a29991.jpg

vs. Trump Crowds:

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/09/24/23/2CB066F800000578-3248214-image-a-2_1443132727378.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/09/23/23/2CB1092D00000578-3246791-image-a-2_1443046088866.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/09/25/15/2CC261EF00000578-3248214-image-a-1_1443191424447.jpg


326 posted on 01/05/2016 8:52:39 PM PST by TXDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson