History has shown the 'progression' to be Registration, Confiscation, Annihilation.
The national socialist left has already been clear on the first two...
6 posted on â1â/â5â/â2016â â9â:â05â:â23â âAM by Torcert (Veritas odium paret. (Truth creates hatred.) - Terence)
It is my opinion that, under these EOs, any senior citizen who becomes ill, has to have a hospital stay or take pain medication, have home healthcare or who have a Power of Attorney Order so that their children can help them with business matters, etc., will also have their rights to protect themselves taken away.
Since there are no definitions provided (as usual) any of the above reasons or just about any the Regime cares to state, will be justification. And any senior citizen who lives in government subsidized housing might just as well resign themselves to being corralled in one of those sitting duck, gun free zones.
I've had enough attacks on my rights just because of my age. Bullies and tyrants always pick off the weakest first.
7 posted on â1â/â5â/â2016â â9â:â05â:â47â âAM by Aleya2Fairlie
Check out article.
(Those who seek to DISARM US, seek to HARM US.) .
I have no doubt that will just be the beginning.
Recall what happened in the old Soviet union where they would decide dissidents were mentally ill and institutionalize them.
You can best believe this won’t be the end of the issue, after the next few exploitative incidents, you can well wager that his majesty will be back one again to dictate more new laws.
What were the Founding Fathers “requirements” to own fire arms???