Continued at URL above.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: taraytarah
Beck has a point. If the first judge violated the law on sentencing guidelines then why isn’t he in trouble for that? Because the FedMob has an agenda and prosecution is selective based on that agenda.
53 posted on
01/04/2016 2:20:41 PM PST by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
To: taraytarah
The 5 year minimum sentence is for terrorism, not arson.
To: taraytarah; goodnesswins; PROCON; Twotone; VeryFRank; Clinging Bitterly; Rio; aimhigh; ...
If you would like more information about what's happening in Oregon, please FReepmail me.
I lost my Oregon list when my computer crashed last year, so please send me your name by FReepmail if you want to be on this list.
86 posted on
01/04/2016 3:57:01 PM PST by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: taraytarah
I said that the first day this story broke.
87 posted on
01/04/2016 3:57:32 PM PST by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: taraytarah
Owebowma could put this fire out immediately and pardon these men couldn’t he?
But he won’t. He wants to make whitey pay. He wants to make these men out to be the poster-children of all malitias.
He wants to stoke the flames and destroy America. In order to fundamentally change it.
89 posted on
01/04/2016 4:23:07 PM PST by
vpintheak
(Death before disarmament!)
To: taraytarah
Re-sentencing, whether valid or not, is not double jeopardy.
93 posted on
01/04/2016 6:17:53 PM PST by
Oceander
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson