Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmokingJoe

Yes, plain English and your conclusion has absolutely nothing to do with what I posted. Apparently, you are the one having a difficult time of understanding. You’re drawing conclusions on what is not there. I said nothing about using force or violence to carry out unlawful acts, specific or otherwise.


60 posted on 01/04/2016 6:41:57 PM PST by Jagdgewehr (It will take blood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Jagdgewehr
Ok so why don't we go back to your post # 9 which I replied to in the first place. I will cut and paste.

Ted Cruz:
“But we don�¢â‚¬Ëœt have a constitutional right to use force and violence and to threaten force and violence against others.”

You:
Uh....Ted...time to go back and read up on the Founding Fathers’ reasons for the 2nd Amendment.

You basically had a problem with Ted Cruz's statement that we dont have a constitutional right to use force and violence and to threaten force and violence against others.
So I asked you if you'd be happy for a bunch of rough and ready boys from the hood to use force and violence to seize your property. It's simple enough.

61 posted on 01/04/2016 7:02:51 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson