Really not very original...kind of lame, actually. I'm open to hearing anything better you can come up with.
"that’s exactly what I said in my initial post.
Really?
"Nowhere did I state nor imply an affirmative response to the question."
No?
"No, I do not want a dictator."
And yet:
"I want a chief executive who can bitch-slap his own branch of government. I want some iron-fisted bastard to do a smashmouth beatdown of the departments, to a tenth of their current size, and eliminate most of them. Somebody with CEO experience."
So, yeah, in that sense...I do."
31 posted on 12/25/2015, 11:16:20 AM by ROCKLOBSTER
I thought it would help with accuracy to post all of what you said, since jpsb conveniently managed to excluse that last sentence.
About the "iron-fisted bastard who will do the smashmouth beatdowns".
Well, that only leads me to conclude that you otherwise approve of the status quo of millions of career political RAT-hacks "serving" in six-figure, do-nothing/no-show jobs and who are being used to attack the very American people who are paying their salaries.
Oh wait...Are you a bureaucRAT?
I seriously doubt that you are going to try and tell me that the Executive branch is run as a bottom-up, self-regulating entity, where even the lowest positions have an equal voice in operations.
If that were the case, there would be no need for a CEO, other than to serve as a figurehead.
Is that what you want?
Really not very original...kind of lame, actually. I'm open to hearing anything better you can come up with.
Yeah?
Well, I was going to open with "Snotty Kathy" but I thought that may have been a little harsh.