Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Oregon militia standoff shouldn't end in bloodshed
Hot Air.com ^ | January 3, 2016 | TAYLOR MILLARD

Posted on 01/03/2016 4:13:57 PM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-197 next last
To: Wpin
Invective is not reasoning.

It's the saddest way of admitting you've lost the argument.

161 posted on 01/04/2016 10:30:37 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade

And before that, the BLM harassed the Hammonds for a decade, closing their roads, taking them to court over water rights....the Hammonds won.

Make no mistake, the BLM is in the business of closing ranches and adding to their federal land stockpile in the west.
Too many creepers here are clueless about this assault on the west.


162 posted on 01/04/2016 10:32:23 AM PST by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: MarMema
Bundy was more than willing to pay his fees and tried on several occasions to pay his county.

He says he was willing to pay the county.

However, he and the county both knew very well that the county did not own the land.

So he was pretending to be willing to pay someone who didn't own the land.

If I don't pay my landlord my rent, but tell him I am more than willing to pay my rent to a different landlord I like better, then there is a word for what I am.

Squatter.

163 posted on 01/04/2016 10:34:06 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: freedomjusticeruleoflaw

They live in cities or places where they don’t get the rural land takeover happening in the west.
They think agenda 21 is a conspiracy theory even though it is all spelled out on the UN and many other websites.
They don’t take the time to read the entire story because of the Facebook mentality.
They see Bundy as backward and ignorant and assume the worst.
They don’t want to believe that things in this country are far far worse than most people think, or know that President Bush refused to sign at Rio.
They are hoping to remain in their snug homes watching their favorite shows and not have to worry about the fact that we are on the very edge of losing the country we grew up in, and it may already be too late.


164 posted on 01/04/2016 10:39:43 AM PST by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Wpin

The wife of the manager of the wildlife refuge took the Hammonds back to court. A convenient husband.wife team.
Earth first!!! Who cares about bullying and harrasing people on their own land for ten years? Not the BLM.


165 posted on 01/04/2016 10:43:49 AM PST by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Well.....The victims of the Ferguson riots would disagree with you that the government will defend your property. Am I correct that our modern courts have ruled that the police are under no obligation to do that?

And...Unless property taxes ( government rents) are paid, the government landlord will prohibit the transfer of property to heirs unless the government rent ( taxes) is paid.

While I understand the historical context for your argument, is it appropriate in today's industrialized society to continue with property taxes?

166 posted on 01/04/2016 10:43:54 AM PST by wintertime (Stop treating government teachers like they are reincarnated Mother Teresas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: freedomjusticeruleoflaw

Oh no, they see it as purposeful.
It will serve as a corridor under agenda 21.


167 posted on 01/04/2016 10:45:17 AM PST by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Property rights looks like a good hill to me.
They are rapidly diminishing in the west.


168 posted on 01/04/2016 10:47:58 AM PST by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: MarMema
Property rights looks like a good hill to me.

The Bundys have never been about property rights.

They are all about squatting.

The Hammonds have a much better argument for their position than the Bundys ever did, but it doesn't look like they are the ones occupying federal land.

It looks like the Bundys are doing that for their own purposes and using the Hammonds as figurative human shields.

169 posted on 01/04/2016 10:51:52 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
One of the problems with property taxes on businesses is that they are hidden taxes and they are highly regressive. All taxes on businesses are passed on to the consumer of the product or service in the form of higher prices. There is no way for the consumer to calculate how much he has paid the government in taxes when he purchases a product or service. The poor pay just as much as the wealthy on any individual product or service.

Also....High property taxes on businesses ( on equipment, land, and buildings) contribute to businesses moving their operations our of our country.

Personally, while historically property taxes served a purpose in an agricultural society, ( Land was essentially income) in an industrial society other forms of taxes would be more transparent to those who do ultimately pay them.

Property taxes distort the economy as well. My husband and I a perfect example. We have very deliberately planned where we live and the style in which we live in an effort to reduce paying rent ( property taxes) to the government landlord.

170 posted on 01/04/2016 10:53:17 AM PST by wintertime (Stop treating government teachers like they are reincarnated Mother Teresas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
The victims of the Ferguson riots would disagree with you that the government will defend your property.

The government is obliged to defend their title to their property.

If property taxes were meant to provide the equivalent of 24 hour on-site armed security, the cost would be greater than the property itself.

You insure your property against loss.

But if someone takes over your property and claims it is theirs, the government has the obligation to remove them and assert your title.

Title is proof against seizure, not against burglary and arson.

171 posted on 01/04/2016 10:55:54 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

You may want to read the link I posted to become more educated about the new contract the feds wanted him to sign when he paid. The one that enabled the BLM to shut down several neighboring ranches.

When corruption is the norm, Bundy is a hero.
US elected officials were there on the ranch to support him and help him get his cattle back.
Are you saying they supported a greedy squatter who just didn’t want to pay his grazing fees? All of those oath keepers just wanted Bundy to keep his fees? Pretty amazing.


172 posted on 01/04/2016 11:02:16 AM PST by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

So Matt Shea left his home in Spokane, Wa and drove to the Bundy ranch, camped there and supported the Bundys in order for them to not pay their fees?

An attorney and recipient of numerous medals, including the Bronze star.

I can keep going....but do you see how stupid you sound yet?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Shea


173 posted on 01/04/2016 11:16:50 AM PST by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: MarMema
An attorney and recipient of numerous medals, including the Bronze star.

You realize that an argument based on the credentials of someone else isn't really an argument, right?

Rather than speculating on Matt Shea's state of mind, I'd like to see an explanation of how a mere offer to pay a third party is the same thing as paying one's actual counterparty.

Perhaps I sound stupid for asking for proof that 2 + 2 = 5, rather than just taking Matt Shea's word for it.

But I still want the proof, and until then I will stick with 2 + 2 = 4.

174 posted on 01/04/2016 11:25:17 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

And all of these elected officials went to the Bundy ranch to support him as
a squatter?

http://votefiore.com/

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Thorpe_(politician)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelly_Townsend

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judy_Burges

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelli_Ward


175 posted on 01/04/2016 11:41:04 AM PST by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

You said squatting and now that I have shown you the many elected officials who went to the ranch, supposedly to support squatting, you can obviously see how ridiculous that accusation is.

Changing the subject doesn’t work.


176 posted on 01/04/2016 11:43:17 AM PST by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: MarMema
You said squatting and now that I have shown you the many elected officials who went to the ranch, supposedly to support squatting, you can obviously see how ridiculous that accusation is.

Many elected officials in NYC testified on behalf of, and met with, the Lower East Side squatters in the 1980s.

They were still squatters.

I really don't care who the Bundys' fans are or were.

I care about the facts of the case.

And the fact is that the Bundys were using land they did not own without paying for it, and when they were called on it, they said they were wiling to pay people other than the owners on their own terms.

Did you testify at Kelli Ward's chemtrails hearings?

177 posted on 01/04/2016 11:49:17 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

These Oregon fellows are in a Refuge.

Start calling them the Oregon Refugees every where you go.

Word Judo.


178 posted on 01/04/2016 11:50:16 AM PST by Lazamataz (If the Oregon occupiers are occupying a National Wildlife REFUGE, are they not now REFUGEES?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

http://www.life-enhancement.com/magazine/article/3132-a-true-story-durks—participation-in-the-negotiations-with-the-bureau-of-land-management-and-two-r


179 posted on 01/04/2016 11:50:57 AM PST by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Laz, as always, I like your style.


180 posted on 01/04/2016 11:52:04 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-197 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson