Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cold Heat

“Ultimately, I voted yes on final passage because it may delay, slightly, President Obama’s ability to lift the Iran sanctions and it ensures we will have a Congressional debate on the merits of the Iran deal.”

Only thing wrong with that is that the Corker bill ensured that the Iranian deal is now law. Why does Cruz say that he will get rid of it if he becomes president if it is not law?

The White House wrote the bill. Why would the White House author a bill that defeats its own agenda?


965 posted on 01/04/2016 10:35:28 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 962 | View Replies ]


To: odawg

The vote was 99-1....

The one dissenting vote was my congress critter...Tom Cotton.

It was a done deal in every way possible...Perhaps cruz could have made a better call, maybe not, but with most senate votes, there are contingencies...

Since the vote was not even close, and cruz has not changed his positions on iran as his arguments indicate during debate of his amendment, the yes vote on passage meant nothing..IMO especially since every conservative in the senate voted for it, save for one who had previously staked out his position.


967 posted on 01/04/2016 10:43:11 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 965 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson