Once again, Alan Grayson violates ethics rules, using House committee clip in campaign ad

Saint Peters Blog ^ | 12/29/15 | Peter Schorsch

[Libloather]

But this is Alan Grayson, and his ad becomes just one more in an ever-lengthening list of campaign violations for using his taxpayer-funded Congressional office.

Total slug.

[This_far]

what law do we get to ignore

[Texas Eagle]

Sic 'im, Paul Ryan! Throw the book at him! Make him rue the day he violated House ethics rules!

Uhhhhhh......Ryan?.........Ryan?.......Anybody seen Paul?

[Jack Hammer]

‘ethics rules’???

Hahahahahaha....

[Carry_Okie]

what law do we get to ignore

It's not a statutory law but a rule of the House.

[This_far]

pardon, I didn’t mean to be specific to the post, but more a question to my (our) “representative(s)”

As in, why should we care about or obey any law when you don’t and allow obama not to?

[Carry_Okie]

Understood. I just wanted to point out that the enforcement provisions are different.

[ImNotLying]

From a gerrymandered district running north to south that looks like a cross between a snake and an octopus. Full of stupid progressives.

[ronnie raygun]

Once again he escaped the bell tower

[exit82]

Anybody seen Paul?

Busy trimming his beard.....

[McBuff]

Rest assured. . .Ryan's got this one. . .

[ripley]

“...full of stupid Progressives.”

Better it would be better to say stupid, psychotic, scu*bag Progressives, but, words don’t exist that are adequate enough to say who they are.

IMHO

[Angels27]

This ass-clown may very well be the next Senator from Florida.

Doesn’t this wife beater have a war on women?

[This_far]

Good point, thanks