Mia "Moochelle wannabe" McLeod
Posted on 01/02/2016 5:46:27 PM PST by jazusamo
No kidding.
The vasectomy ban is particularly nonsensical.
Yes, because fixing a male body function not working right, is exactly the same as trying to stop the outcome of a female body working right.
Viagra vs Birth Control and abortion.
Apples vs Oranges
Not understanding how a man’s erections or ability to obtain one is the taxpayer’s responsibility.
yeah, what does erectile dysfunction have in common with abortion?
just wow.
Put a seven-day waiting period on dildos and batteries and see womyn drop this issue.
This will give the legislators election problems. I say, bring it!
Idiot stunt by idiot Dems. There are legitimate medical reasons to prescribe Viagra that have nothing to do with “old guy can’t get it up anymore.” Spinal cord injury can certain lead to E.D.. Medical care consists of returning an ill or injured body back to normal function as much as possible. Abortion consists of destroying a normal result of sex (the preborn child) that is not medical care.
This ******* wouldn’t be a lesbian by any chance,would she?
Leftists have never been particularly bright, but this is especially stupid. Vasectomies don't prevent any children from being born - vasectomies prevent children from being conceived.
Has Bob Dole chimed in on this yet?
Liberal justice or liberal fairness is only about revenge on supposed enemies.
Because taking a medication to correct a medical deficiency is the same as taking a medication or having a procedure in order to kill your unborn child.
Bump!
1. I would prefer to see a very high standard met before anyone gets my tax dollars. Abortion never meets that standard, and neither does recreational sex (and thus Viagra does not).
2. Outside the realm of taxpayer subsidies, there is a huge difference between Viagra and abortion, namely that Viagra does not kill an innocent child. Liberals pretend this is not the point in abortion legislation, but they really know better. We cannot allow them to continue repeating the lie that abortion restrictions are not about saving innocent lives unchallenged.
“This ******* wouldn’t be a lesbian by any chance, would she?”
She may very well be. What church was it she was just getting out of as she went to do a Sunday interview about her Viagra bill?
Mia "Moochelle wannabe" McLeod
“What kind of man would want a woman like this?”
I don’t know. When I googled for her picture, the only man that appears to have been captured on film with her was Barrack Obama.
“Not understanding how a man’s erections or ability to obtain one is the taxpayer’s responsibility.”
Typical chick response I guess. Taxpayers aren’t involved here. EXCEPT, someone wanted a man to have to do all sorts of strange things if he wants to get a Viagra prescription.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.