.
The word of God describes the bodies of the angels is considerable detail.
Therefore they must have bodies
Foolish ignorant catholic games.
Buy a Bible, and read it.
Buy a Bible, and read it.
I own over 30, and stopped counting the times I have been through it cover to cover when I passed about 4 dozen. I’ve been through it all in Greek, albeit relying heavily on the facing page translation in most of it, but my Hebrew is not yet up to going through the OT without considerable support, though it is good enough for scholarly mucking around.
The word of God describes the bodies of the angels is considerable detail.
While there are a handful of places that angels are described, I would hardly categorize the detail as considerable, and generally it is along the lines of metaphorical or artistic description.
Cherubs seem the most frequently described category of angel, and the description is more along how they are to be depicted in various pieces of religious art than what the look like. Exodus 25:20 says that they are to be portrayed with outspread CNPh, which would be best translated as “extremities,” and could be more specifically translated as wings or skirts, among other things.
Ezekiel 10:14 speaks of a single face, Ezekiel 41:18 speaks of a double face—but as in one instance the verb used is best translated as “appears,” meaning that we are dealing with a symbolic description of an ineffable reality, and in the other we are dealing with a description of how they are portrayed in the new temple, there is only a contradiction to get worked up about if one over-reads the text.
Given that Cherubim are portrayed with extremities, and no doubt portrayed with particular types of extremities (sort of a given if one has art that doesn’t consist of shapes), it is not surprising that the same language is used when describing other angels.