BOMBSHELL: US Government Planned/Funded Failed Muslim Conquest Of USSR As Far Back As The 1950s

Shoebat.com ^ | Dec. 22, 2015 | Andrew Bieszand

[SatinDoll]

[Original title too long: BOMBSHELL: US Government Planned And Funded A Failed Muslim Conquest Of Russia As Far Back As The 1950s]

Last week I wrote about how open-source documents expose that the CIA worked directly with Saudi princes to create ISIS. In another bombshell revelation, former Top Secret Intelligence Bulletins uncovered by journalist Wayne Madsen reveal that the CIA has been backing Muslim terrorists since the 1950s and even attempted to use them in a failed effort to undermine, overthrow, and conquer the former USSR. Via Infowars:

According to its own formerly TOP SECRET Central Intelligence Bulletin, dated December 4, 1952, during the waning days of the Harry Truman administration, the Central Intelligence Agency had embarked on a program to foment nationalism among the Uzbek tribes of Afghanistan in order that it might spill across the border into the Uzbek Soviet Socialist Republic, a constituent republic of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

This revelation means that the current attempt by such anti-Russian U.S. official and quasi-official intelligence policy makers, including former Jimmy Carter national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, hedge fund tycoon George Soros, and CIA director John Brennan, to bring about a radical Muslim destabilization of the Russian Federation is nothing new.

A snippet of the one of the uncovered documents. (See source.)

The Afghan Uzbek group, called the Mogul Band by the CIA, was reported by the CIA to have had “considerable strength in the northern part of the country” and “hoped to ‘reunite’ Afghan Uzbeks with fellow tribesmen across the Soviet frontier.” The CIA also reported that the Afghan Uzbeks “tried to attract support” from mainly Shi’a Hazara tribal leaders in northern Afghanistan.

It is clear that the CIA was involved in antagonizing Afghan Uzbeks against the Soviets in response to what the CIA deemed “Soviet subversion” of Uzbek tribes inside Afghanistan. The reference to the Mogul Band is the earliest example of the CIA using external Muslim forces against the Soviet Union. In the 1970s, the overthrow of the Afghan king and the establishment of a socialist republic in Afghanistan prompted the CIA to organize a jihadist army to fight against the secular Afghan government and its Soviet protectors. The jihadist army that fought the Soviets in Afghanistan was the embryo out of which the Taliban, Al Qaeda, and, ultimately, the Islamic State (or Da’esh) arose.

[driftdiver]

lol stop being a silly little punk

We installed/supported/sent arms to all kinds of despots in efforts to keep Russia back. Heck we used to store munitions and arms in Somalia. Supplies we essentially abandoned when the cold war ended as they were no longer needed.

[driftdiver]

The scary thing is that as evil as those two were they are better then whats in place now.

[Maine Mariner]

You are absolutely correct. The same with Assad in Syria.

[DugwayDuke]

InfoWars? Alex Jones? Do you think those are credible sources?

[TigerClaws]

Correct.

But this is part of the ‘blame America for everything’ narrative the left teaches in their indoctrination camps, er, public schools.

[driftdiver]

A close fried who spent A LOT of time in Afghanistan and Iraq as a civilian advisor with daily contact with local business and govt people has told me they didn’t mind so much. At least they knew what the rules were. Dont cross Saddam and he pretty much left you alone aside from turning off your water to fill his swimming pools every now and then.

[driftdiver]

How did Saddam get into power? Who supported him? Who kept him from being removed?

Same for the rest.

We danced with the devil to fight the bigger evil of Russia. Its not left wing to acknowledge the reality of what we did.

[Buckeye McFrog]

This was probably sound strategic thinking at the time.

Reagan received similar warnings about funding the Mujahadeen. He decided that taking down the USSR was the critical goal and did it anyway.

[Theoria]

Things never change.

An acclaimed historian tells, for the first time, the full story of the conspiracy between the Germans and the Turks to unleash a Muslim holy war against the British in India and the Russians in the Caucasus. Drawing on recently opened intelligence files and rare personal accounts, Peter Hopkirk skillfully reconstructs the Kaiser's bold plan and describes the exploits of the secret agents on both sides-disguised variously as archaeologists, traders, and circus performers-as they sought to foment or foil the uprising and determine the outcome of World War I.

...the book traces the roots of many modern crises: Britain, trying to create buffer zones against Russia, occupies Afghanistan and considers seizing Baghdad, where a British diplomat blithely proclaims that Sunnis and Shiites “could always be played off against each other.”

[SatinDoll]

I do not go to InfoWars and I do not listen to Alex Jones.

[SatinDoll]

Yeah. That the kind of editing that gets people killed. Like when Putin warned Obama about the Chechens. Remember that? I thought not.

[huldah1776]

L8R

[Gandalf the Mauve]

A standard “Let’s You And Him Fight” ploy. They work OK in the short run, but can come back to bite you in the butt in the long run.

[mac_truck]

Is Matt Drudge a credible source?

[DugwayDuke]

“I do not go to InfoWars and I do not listen to Alex Jones.”

Really? You linked an article which states:

“Last week I wrote about how open-source documents expose that the CIA worked directly with Saudi princes to create ISIS. In another bombshell revelation, former Top Secret Intelligence Bulletins uncovered by journalist Wayne Madsen reveal that the CIA has been backing Muslim terrorists since the 1950s and even attempted to use them in a failed effort to undermine, overthrow, and conquer the former USSR. Via Infowars:”

Follow the link. Your “bombshell” is taken completely from Infowars.

[SatinDoll]

A few years ago I was watching the Boston Marathon. When the bombing happened I already knew there was a drill planned for that day and so I wasn’t surprised when the bombing happened.

I watched video taken from across the street and reported it here on Free Republic.

My report was removed by a Moderator on orders of Mr.Robinson, because InfoWars had reported exactly what I had seen, too.

So, does the fact that InfoWars reported something made it invalid, or do you make it a habit to shoot the messenger?

By the way, I did not see that reference to InfoWars; I did read that the article was reported by Wayne Madsen.

[DugwayDuke]

“By the way, I did not see that reference to InfoWars; I did read that the article was reported by Wayne Madsen.”

I do not make a habit out of “shooting the messenger”. I do make it a habit to follow links. Your article is a direct lift from infowars. And, yes, anything reported by infowars or Jones is automatically suspect.

You really need to be more careful of sources.

[BeadCounter]

The thing about Alex Jones and infowars is they cry wolf all the time and Jones makes his living with this kind of stuff; it’s his job so when he does say something truthful, one doesn’t know to believe it or not. Shoebat is hit and miss but he, debka file and a number of sources are to be skeptical about.