“None of those versions corroborates your original contention.”
My original contention is supported by the statements of the police, which you attempted to impeach by citing the franchisees, even though their own corporate office basically called them liars.
All agree that the original contention is one made by Stroman. Stroman's contention is not supported by the DPS report, as well as being denied by the franchisee.
-- ... even though their [franchisee] own corporate office basically called them liars. --
Got a cite for that? Did the corporate offices claim that the franchisee refused to cooperate with the police?