FYI, Cruz's Dominionism is theonomy, just a more retarded version.
Love rejoices in the truth, yes, but love is also kind,
Kindness is wasted on the prosperity gimps and worthless dogs of the modern day American church.
What is your evidence that Cruz himself supports Dominionism? He is a Souther Baptist. I know his father has been accused of being a dominionist, and maybe he is, but that wouldn’t prove Cruz was. My own father and I had serious theological differences that were never resolved, though we loved each other dearly.
As for dominionists, yes, that is problematic. There is an old Presbyterian church right next door to me that is owned and run by a gaggle of dominionists. Having been a Southern Baptist myself, I can tell you the two are quite different. My position, until I know better, is that Ted is a Southern Baptist, not a dominionist.
So then, what is your evidence? My own quick perusal found only guilt by association (Raphael), which as you surely know is a fallacy. I also saw some folks conflating a legitimate interest in godly governance with the bizarre eschatology of dominionism, and that too is a fallacy, a category error. What is your smoking gun?
Peace,
SR