The Sessions-Cruz Video Fox News Doesn’t Want You to See

Conservative Review ^ | December 21st, 2015 | Daniel Horowitz

[Isara]

When establishment candidates are losing support with the voters, they often resort to their last subterfuge in the bag of tricks.  They try to taint their conservative opponent as something less than a consistent conservative in the hopes of deflating the momentum of said opponent.  I’ve seen this dynamic play out in almost every competitive primary.  And this is exactly what we are seeing with the entire GOP establishment media that is suddenly concerned that Ted Cruz is not really a conservative. 

To those of us who worked on the immigration issue in 2013, there was no secret as to who was pushing amnesty and who was fighting for American sovereignty.  But who better than Jeff Sessions to set the record straight?  Here it is straight from the mouth of the general that Cruz was standing with him “every step of the way”:

Jeff Sessions: Ted Cruz was on my side to defeat the Gang of Eight amnesty bill (Video)

“I believe without the vigorous opposition of Ted Cruz, this bill likely would have passed.  So we need to thank him for that.”

Notice that Sen. Sessions speaks of the $1.5 billion spent on ads promoting the Gang of 8. Guess who starred in those ads for Mark Zuckerberg?  Yup, the junior senator from Florida. 

Sessions goes on to recount that day in May 2013, when the Senate Judiciary Committee met to mark up the bill and how Cruz was one of the first people he saw rattle Schumer’s cage. 

You won’t see this video played on Fox News.  They will continue to entertain themselves within their insular echo chamber.  Unfortunately for them, the voters aren’t listening.

[Springfield Reformer]

BTW, why did you misquote me? I do not want future readers to think I said what you have in quotes as my words:

... despite your "she's just an obscure sunday school teacher!"

I never said she was obscure.  I said she was controversial. That's the opposite of being obscure, don't you think? The fact remains that her role as Sunday School teacher demonstrates her lower rank in the church's teaching authority.  You have no basis for speculating that Ted is anything but a standard issue Southern Baptist.  

BTW, if you hope to work on Law Review someday, you will absolutely get nailed for sloppy representation of the statements of others. Just giving you a heads up.

Peace,

SR

[Greetings_Puny_Humans]

But you never demonstrated that those folks at the laying on of hands were dominionists.

Didn't think I had to, but then I remembered I was dealing with a delusional sophist:

Here's the head of the group that blessed and anointed Ted Cruz.

"I'm not in a position to opine on academic disputes between historians, but I can tell you that David Barton is a good man, a courageous leader and a friend,” Cruz told POLITICO."

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/david-barton-historian-right-christian-96443.html#ixzz3v9frw0Qu

This David Barton is also within Glenn Beck's wicked sphere of influence (as is Ted Cruz himself), and has defended the Mormon heretic Glenn Beck as a Christian:

https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=150770881618696

Of course, Beck is also involved in Dominionism's Ecumenical push to bring Roman Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, whatever, into one "church."

"As you can see, one of the speakers was Word Faith heretic Kenneth Copeland's friend David Barton. Barton is aligned with the New Apostolic Reformation and dominionism,1 and as Brannon Howse has brought out:

On his April 4, 2011 David Barton’s radio program description included, "Culture can be divided into 7 pillars of influence- Family, Religion, Education, Media, Entertainment, Business and Government."

This is the exact same pillars of C. Peter Wagner’s New Apostolic Reformation "Seven Mountain Mandate". In a May 31, 2007 letter C. Peter Wagner wrote:

In my view it is not possible to get an operational handle on how to initiate corporate action toward social transformation without taking into account the seven mountains or what I like to call "molders of culture." The seven are religion, family, business, arts & entertainment, government, education, and media."

http://apprising.org/2012/08/07/david-barton-controversy/

you offer a concrete definition of dominionism.

Dominionism is the retarded cousin of Rushdoony's old Theonomy. It was pioneered by C. Peter Wagner and his New Apostolic Reformation cult. It differs from theonomy in that it's theology is stupider, but they come to the same conclusions.

BTW, why did you misquote me?

Didn't intend it to be a direct quote; it's mocking your stupid position. By the way, the "Sunday School Teacher" is entirely your fabrication. She's never described as such.

I said she was controversial.

To who? The SBC promotes her and her eastern mysticism and Roman Catholic apologia:

http://apprising.org/2012/05/06/southern-baptists-assist-the-roman-catholic-church-to-infiltrate-evangelicalism/