Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux

Hmmm...Rush was also in the bag for the Bush dynasty. Sealed and delivered.


5 posted on 12/17/2015 11:46:27 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dragnet2
Hmmm...Rush was also in the bag for the Bush dynasty. Sealed and delivered.

Since when? Rush has NOT been a Bush fan. Maybe GW back around the time of 9/11, but not much since.

22 posted on 12/17/2015 12:03:39 PM PST by madison10 (If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: dragnet2
Rush was also in the bag for the Bush dynasty.

He liked the Bush's, but I wouldn't say he was in the bag. Under Bush43, he opposed "entitlement" expansion when the WH was the only entity looking to do so, including the most of the Dems, and he opposed Bush43's amnesty plan as well.

Yes, he would give half-hearted explanations of the Bush41-Clinton love fests on tv when challenged.

Haven't been a regular listener to Rush since he went "All Iced Tea All The Time", so if he's been praising/defending HEB!, perhaps you're on to something.

32 posted on 12/17/2015 12:23:11 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson