Skip to comments.
Why Ted Cruz ‘proposed’ the legalization of illegals during the Gang of 8 bill
The Right Scoop ^
| 12/16/15
| The Right Scoop
Posted on 12/16/2015 8:58:55 AM PST by thetallguy24
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
"I have never supported legalization and I do not intend to support legalization," said Cruz.
Isn't that lawyer-speak for maybe?
To: thetallguy24
He doesn’t support it, he just proposed it, because he doesn’t want it. You betcha.
2
posted on
12/16/2015 9:00:49 AM PST
by
Wolfie
To: Wolfie
3
posted on
12/16/2015 9:02:33 AM PST
by
wiggen
(#JeSuisCharlie)
To: thetallguy24
4
posted on
12/16/2015 9:02:52 AM PST
by
wiggen
(#JeSuisCharlie)
To: thetallguy24
I don’t support legalization and don’t intend to support legalization.
Where’s the legal speak in my statement?
5
posted on
12/16/2015 9:03:06 AM PST
by
cowboyway
(Returning the federal government to its constitutional limits is a Lost Cause.)
To: thetallguy24
This is the only thing I don’t like about Cruz.
To: Wolfie
This is a tactic used by both Cruz and Sessions in the Gang of 8 Bill. You can’t seriously think Sessions wants legalization? It is a “poison pill” parliamentary procedure used to kill bad bills.
7
posted on
12/16/2015 9:07:02 AM PST
by
conservativejoy
(Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God,,,, We can elect Ted Cruz!)
To: thetallguy24
Poison Pill amendment strategy! To all have ears to hear hear!
8
posted on
12/16/2015 9:07:42 AM PST
by
DaveyB
(Live free or die!)
To: thetallguy24
Did you actually click the link, view the video and read Amanda Carpenter's Tweets?
Here's the money quote: "So Cruz said ok, here are some amendments that do everything EXCEPT path to citizenship. And the Gang killed them exposing the big hoax."
9
posted on
12/16/2015 9:07:47 AM PST
by
reegs
To: cowboyway; thetallguy24
Whereâs the legal speak in my statement?
It's only "legal speak" if you are a Trump fan-boy looking for something, anything to bash his competitor, Cruz, over the head with.
10
posted on
12/16/2015 9:08:13 AM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: cowboyway
Replace “intend” with “won’t” and you’ve said something I can support.
11
posted on
12/16/2015 9:10:39 AM PST
by
Wolfie
To: SoConPubbie
These Trumpsters are starting to remind me of the Paulbots.
12
posted on
12/16/2015 9:10:59 AM PST
by
cowboyway
(Returning the federal government to its constitutional limits is a Lost Cause.)
To: thetallguy24
Not enough tinfoil in Wal-Mart for me to believe this twisted, tortured, convolutedly-implausible explanation.
13
posted on
12/16/2015 9:12:05 AM PST
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: reegs
If this were true, he’d simply have added an amendment to deny citizenship.
14
posted on
12/16/2015 9:15:28 AM PST
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: thetallguy24
This is total bull stuff and the Cruz folks know it.
Ted Cruz supported illegal aliens staying inside our nation as part of his idea on how to fix the illegal alien problem.
It wasn’t just in this hearing. He supported it with statements before and after those hearings.
As late as circa July 2015, Ted was interviewed and asked something to the effect of, what about the good ones, can any of them stay. Ted stated, we can find a way.
This presentation on this tread is not true.
That’s something that really troubles me about Ted.
He knew what the laws of our nation were. He was supposed to have one of the best Constitutional minds around.
None the less, when it came to illegal aliens, Ted didn’t think it necessary to enforce the laws of our nation until now when he wants to be president.
I’ve had it with the Cruz team around here.
This guy is a lying two faced ass.
I’m going to do a workup on this and post it on the forum.
Then you folks can deal with what Ted really is.
15
posted on
12/16/2015 9:16:20 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Man the sour grapes are strong with the Crewz...)
To: Fantasywriter
Better still, he could have added an amendment that mandated a wall first, and THEN denied citizenship.
16
posted on
12/16/2015 9:19:45 AM PST
by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: Fantasywriter
That’s precisely what his amendments did.
Again, the question: do you believe Jeff Sessions is for amnesty through legalization? The talk on FR for months has been how Seasions and Trump put their heads together to formulate the best immigration policy. How then is it so unbelievable that Sessions and Cruz worked so well on these Gang of 8 amendments?
17
posted on
12/16/2015 9:20:12 AM PST
by
brothers4thID
("We've had way too many Republicans whose #1 virtue is "I get along great with Democrats".")
To: DoughtyOne
So, the sour grapes are only with the Cruz crowd, FRiend? Your tagline is illustrative.
18
posted on
12/16/2015 9:20:47 AM PST
by
Night Hides Not
(Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Mississippi! My vote is going to Cruz.)
To: conservativejoy
This is a tactic used by both Cruz and Sessions in the Gang of 8 Bill. You can't seriously think Sessions wants legalization? It is a "poison pill" parliamentary procedure used to kill bad bills.
Nobody was tougher on border control than Duncan Hunter Sr and he was a pro at the poison pill strategy. When the open border crowd tried to sneak things past us by the teaspoon, Hunter would drop a 55 gallon drum of the same into a bill and the open border boys would scatter to get away from it.
It ain't pretty but it is how the sausage is made.
19
posted on
12/16/2015 9:21:05 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
To: DoughtyOne
Bring it. We’re quite fed up with you as well.
20
posted on
12/16/2015 9:21:10 AM PST
by
brothers4thID
("We've had way too many Republicans whose #1 virtue is "I get along great with Democrats".")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson