Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Here are the ideological principles that lead me to support Donald Trump.

This election, to me, is a single issue election. Immigration. I’m not just looking at THIS election, but ALL future elections. We know that the Democrats are importing illegal voters for the purposes of fraud, and it’s getting close to the point where the combination of gimmie voters, fraudulent voters, and other trickery will overwhelm law abiding Americans. After that point, we’re screwed. Tyranny or civil war.

And of all the candidates, R and D, Trump is the only one who has even proposed a plan that will reverse this trend. Even if we take everything that Ted Cruz said about the immigration problems facing us at face value—and all you have to do is look at his past statements to see that he may very well be compromised—it’s still not enough.

So here are the possible futures I see.

1: Hillary wins: We’re screwed.
2: Any candidate other than Cruz or Trump wins: We’re screwed.
3: Cruz or Trump win and cannot get a handle on this invasion. We’re screwed.
3: Cruz wins and manages to get his entire agenda implemented, and was telling the truth about everything. We are STILL screwed.
4: Trump wins and was lying through his teeth about everything. We’re screwed.
5: Trump wins and manages to turn this invasion around with his agenda. Then we have a chance.

That’s it. That’s the only thing that matters. Every other issue hinges entirely on this one, because unless we restore the rule of law to immigration, we lose on every other issue. Abortion: we lose. Property rights: we lose. Gun control: we lose.

And that’s why it doesn’t matter how liberal, moderate, conservative, or populist Trump is. Because he is the only candidate in the race who is proposing something that will give us a chance to turn the country back around without a civil war.


14 posted on 12/16/2015 1:13:01 AM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Luircin

Yes, I copied and pasted that from an earlier source I wrote it in; curse you, glitchy apostrophes!


15 posted on 12/16/2015 1:14:04 AM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Luircin

Great post!
Well said my FRiend!


23 posted on 12/16/2015 1:44:15 AM PST by Bobalu (Even if I could take off, I could never get past the tractor beam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Luircin
I support Ted Cruz who went to town but stayed faithful.

Donald Trump has never been faithful to any principle greater than himself and spent these years engaging in crony capitalism in a corrupt system to enrich himself. Now we are to believe that he has come to Jesus.

Well, his road to Damascus never went as far as ethanol, or Scalia. I think we will see more and more of this betrayal of conservative principles by Donald Trump. If he ever gets into the Oval Office he will feel no constraints at all. Will he double the ethanol subsidies? Will he appoint Justices who find Scalia as repugnant as Trump does? Assurances that his conversion is real and permanent are not enough in a candidate who is a mere flip flopper on issues of convenience but Donald Trump is a flip flopper who is a narcissist. There is no reason to believe that once converted he will stay converted.

One can argue that Ted Cruz has modified his positions in the area of immigration which is no more important to you than it is to me. How has he done so? He has moved from no citizenship to no legal status. He has moved from increasing legal immigration and H1B visas to reducing even eliminating immigration and eliminating the latter. Cruz argues that these positions were taken as lines of defense against Rubio's Gang of Eight Bill but even if that exclamation is discounted as subterfuge in an election year, these are not basic ideological rebellions against a lifelong commitment to conservatism. These are not the equivalent, as many on these threads insist, of a change of party, a flip on abortion, and countless other ideological reversals done by Trump as easily as changing gears in your auto. In no sense would Cruz ever justify his changes in policy as matters of self-interest but Trump blatantly does so. One but conclude that his actions are utterly selfish and there is no reason to believe that Trump's lifelong practice will suddenly change when he is beyond our control and becomes the most powerful man in the world as well as one of the richest.

To equate these changes in policy in these two men is to engage in rank relativism. At worst Cruz has changed to accommodate a change in public opinion on issues which are not fundamental or ideologically crucial-albeit immigration is a crucial issue but not an ideological issue as applied in this context. At best Donald Trump has changed to feed his ego. At worst, Cruz has changed on two or three issues but Donald Trump has flipped on everything and is still flipping today and betraying a populist mentality not a conservative mentality when he supports ethanol or attacks Scalia. God knows where Trump will flip-flop next if he gets into office or what will become the flavor of the week that tickles his ego.

To bet the ranch that Donald Trump will continue to maintain his robust posture on immigration-now effectively no more robust than Cruz'-is to bet the ranch on one man's ego whose biography shows it to be mercurial.

How much more prudent to go with a candidate whose default position is not his own ego but honest conservatism.


36 posted on 12/16/2015 2:35:36 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson