Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ctdonath2

They weren’t imprisoned. They were told they couldn’t live in certain areas, and camps were for those who had no place else to go. They could leave the camps if they wanted, but they couldn’t go back to the prohibited zones (there’s a USSC case affirming that). Michelle Malkin wrote an interesting book on the issue of domestic Japanese and WWII. BTW, I have relatives who were in the camps.


44 posted on 12/15/2015 10:35:51 AM PST by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: achilles2000
They weren’t imprisoned. They were told they couldn’t live in certain areas, and camps were for those who had no place else to go.

The barbed wire and the guards were just there to protect them, is that it?

47 posted on 12/15/2015 10:40:40 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: achilles2000

“They weren’t imprisoned. They were told they couldn’t live in certain areas, and camps were for those who had no place else to go”

Well yes, if they are forbidden from being anywhere other than the camps, thus having nowhere to go, and therefore having to live in the camps.

Are you sure you got your information correct? Not saying you are wrong, I’ve just never knew this.


69 posted on 12/15/2015 12:46:29 PM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson