OK, for the sake of argument, Cruz did criticize Trump.
Are Trump’s criticisms of Cruz, that he is bad for fighting the Old Boy Club in DC and coming out against govt subsidies of business, valid? Are these really bad things? If not, what does it say about the person leveling those criticisms?
I thought that some time ago most at FR had concluded the issues of practically open borders, high legal and illegal immigration, and Obama's luring as many poor Third Worlders as possible and more and more Muslims into the US was the most critical issue facing the US at this time. All of that is nothing more than a massive Democrat voter recruitment drive.
It is now very difficult for any Republican to win the presidency, and it will be practically impossible if those trends are not slowed and even stopped. There is only one candidate who has raised those issues to a level no previous candidate even dared to do. This might be the last chance in the lifetime of most living Americans to stop the Dims move to import an electorate that will make the Dims almost unbeatable in presidential campaigns.
All these issue that some are so exercised about today are inconsequential compared to the prospect of decades of Dim rule and leftist court majorities at every level.
And Trump is the only candidate who could reverse these trends. Cruz seems more and more like a stalking horse for the GOPe and I do not trust him at all on the immigration and trade issues.
Ehtanol and Scalia and eminent domain and all this other blather will mean nothing if Hillary wins and appoints two or more SCOTUS justices, including Scalia's replacement, and continues Obama's open borders, Democrat voter recruitment policies.
Trump needs to get his message straight and stop allowing the media to get him off on pointless tangents. But Cruz is playing the fox and fomenting disagreement and causing damage to any hope that a Republican can be elected to fight the Uniparty goals.