Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vermont Lt

It’s not about whether I like the answer you give or not, it is about the fact that the information was in the article that explains why the original owner didn’t remove the decals. He was told not to because it would adversely affect the trade-in value and that the dealership was going to perform that service (contractual obligation at that point).


38 posted on 12/14/2015 10:14:19 AM PST by jurroppi1 (The only thing you "pass to see what's in it" is a stool sample. h/t MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: jurroppi1

I understand that.

I am telling you that as someone who has faced the exact same situation (No dealer wants a truck with 200,00 miles on it AND a ruined paint job.) I am saying that it is up to the brand holder to protect their brand.

That is why I don’t think he will win.


39 posted on 12/14/2015 10:39:00 AM PST by Vermont Lt (I had student debt. It came from a bank. Not from the Govt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson