Here’s some more facts that show that this whole scam is a lie
CO2 was much higher many thousands of years ago- over 800 ppm- The earth survived fine
CO2 always rises 800 years AFTER temperatures rise- proving that CO2 is not the cause of climate change- Ice core samples prove this fact
Although CO2 has been rising for the last 20 years on a yearly basis- temperatures have remained flat- proving once again that CO2 does NOT drive temperature changes
Our atmosphere is 6 quadrillion tons- man’s production of CO2 amounts to a whopping 0.00136% of that total (What do the alarmists thin we should reduce that amount to? 0.00135%?)
(The amount of CO2 by ALL sources, man and nature, is just 0.04% of the atmosphere- man is responsible for 3.4% of that 0.04% meaning 3.4% of 0.04% = 0.00136%)
I would like the alarmists to explain to the world how just 0.00136% of our atmosphere can possibly capture enough escaping heat to cause climate change
I would also like them to explain to us all how CO2 can possibly be causing climate change when temperatures always rise 800 years before CO2 levels do
And finally I would like them to explain to us all how the climate has remained flat for 20 years when CO2 levels have steadily risen since they claim CO2 causes climate change
For me the global warming scam has been a revelation. I of course knew that it was possible for government representatives to lie or for persons in the media to lie but I presumed that the truth would prevail in a reasonable period of time. I thought that except for a few corrupt individuals that the morality and traditions of the United States would keep our media and government honest. But leftist leadership in our country have now demonstrated clearly that morality and tradition mean nothing to them. The truth means nothing to leftist leadership. There is no example that makes this more clear than the global warming scam.
The other epiphany is how vulnerable a large percentage of the population is to scams like this. I would have thought that with the explosion in information technology that this type of misinformation would be very difficult to perpetuate. But this discredited theory should have died out at least a decade ago when it was clearly shown that the observational data did not fit the models or the theory. The “climategate” emails among the top level “scientific” leadership should have put a stake through its heart. But we find instead that the rhetoric has only increased from the people who are pushing this on the population.