Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawyers: Process to contest no-fly list is still inadequate
Daily Record, Rochester, New York ^ | December 10, 2015

Posted on 12/11/2015 8:22:27 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines

PORTLAND, Ore. -- The federal government has not sufficiently improved the process for people barred from flying over the U.S. to challenge their placement on the no-fly list, lawyers for six people on the list told a federal judge Wednesday.

Attorneys from the American Civil Liberties union said the government is not providing enough information for people labeled as potential terrorists to clear their names.

U.S. District Judge Anna Brown of Portland, Oregon did not immediately rule in the case.

Brown ruled last year that the government offers no adequate method for people to contest the travel ban, depriving them of constitutional rights.

In response, federal authorities created an appeals process.

The ACLU says the new rules don't give people enough information to offer a reasonable defense. The group says people deprived of their right to travel must have a chance to see the evidence against them and any information that might benefit them, challenge accusers and offer a defense before a neutral decision-maker.

The case was originally filed in 2010

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailyrecord.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; guncontrol; nofly; secondamendment
But we should use the list to take away someone's Second Amendment rights. Sh'okay.
1 posted on 12/11/2015 8:22:27 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

How about iuf you are NOT a us citizen and you are on the no fly list you get deported.

That would solve a good portion of the problem right there.


2 posted on 12/11/2015 8:26:55 AM PST by Cubs Fan (Black privilege--being able to falsely yell racism and have the media fawn all over you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

If 2nd Amendment rights get tied to the no fly list, this will be ripe for a court challenge.


3 posted on 12/11/2015 8:40:03 AM PST by NonValueAdded (In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

And how you end up on the list is not clear, either. Who’s to say it could not be linked to something like, say, a Tea Party organization affiliation?


4 posted on 12/11/2015 8:40:56 AM PST by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 5thGenTexan
And how you end up on the list is not clear, either. Who’s to say it could not be linked to something like, say, a Tea Party organization affiliation?
5 posted on 12/11/2015 8:59:27 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson