He is ‘pursuing the process’...which is bureaucrat speak to make it look like they are doing something when they are diddling around.
I get that and it’s not new.
Where is our media on this?
Our conservative pundits, at the very least?
At the same time, where are the leftist tools celebrating 0bama’s peacemaking skills?
I watched 0bama’s address and the ONLY new word that I heard was CEASEFIRE.
He wanted to oust Assad, but the American people would not go for it.
After Benghazi, there were serious questions about a series of governments destabilized in North Africa and the Middle East, to the obvious advantage of groups not aligned with American Interests.
People also noticed that while Assad will ruthlessly hold onto the reins of power, he was not murdering Christians, unlike the people who were taking over the destabilized governments.
The Egyptians threw Morsi out, despite his Muslim Brotherhood ties, because murdering Christians is bad for the tourist business.
The media have done a spectacular job of not reporting the salient points, likely to avoid presenting Hillary or Obama in a bad light and thus being denied access to the halls of power. Being there is an important status item for reporters, even to the point that they fail miserably in their jobs in order to retain that status.
Delivering an unbiased account of failure would cost them that status. Look at how Sharyl Atkisson (formerly CBS) was back-benched over Fast and Furious.