Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Isara
Shame on the Washington Examiner for not including the link to the survey information

Their site is bad enough as it is without this ridiculous oversight.

142 posted on 12/07/2015 12:01:03 PM PST by FourPeas (Tone matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FourPeas
The fine print in the survey is fascinating...

Methodological note: This poll marks a slight modification in Monmouth's sampling methodology for the Iowa Republican caucuses. Prior sample frames included past state primary voters only. The current poll includes a small proportion (30%) of regular general election voters. The addition of these voters did not have a significant impact on the overall findings. For example, under the previous tighter sampling frame, Cruz's support would be 25% compared to 24% in the full sample, Trum'’s support would be 16% rather than 19%, and Carson's 13% support would be unchanged. Rubio’s support using the prior frame would be slightly higher (21%) than in the current frame (17%). The current sample frame suggests a high-end turnout level of approximately 140,000 caucusgoers.

147 posted on 12/07/2015 12:04:38 PM PST by FourPeas (Tone matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson