Posted on 12/04/2015 6:46:27 AM PST by surroundedbyblue
Dark vs Light Mohammad?
Wait a minute here... Black Mohamed shoots brown Muhammed and it’s a hate crime???
That is a hate crime!
Re: “The city of Pittsburgh has the opportunity to show that it doesn’t stand for this kind of violence. We’re hoping that it steps up and does that now.”
So I guess the normal violent crime rate is pretty much zilch? Or is it only a crime worthy of noticing because the victim was a Muslim, and when that happens it automatically becomes a hate crime?
After Paris & San Bernadino, you’d think Muslims would shut the hell up and try to stay below the radar, but alas they’re playing the victim card. I know what the game is: uing the PC police to shut you up is one way to force their “religion” into acceptance. Unfortunately there’s a lot of stupid people out there buying into it
Nevermind ....
Lamar Mohamed shoots an unnamed Muzzi, and it is considered a hate crime? Usual Sunni/Shiite intramural scrimmage sounds more likely.
I guess Mayor Peduto is just realizing that violent crimes happen in Hazelwood.
OK, I did some digging, and it appears that all of the media is in on the cover-up of the victim’s name.
Ouch! That’s going to leave a mark on the narrative.
Yes. I posted a great about this earlier in the week before the shooter Mohammed was ID’d. I could’ve sworn the Vic’s name was Mohammed as week but it’s been scrubbed from every news source I could find.
It’s also interesting that when the victim was shot, he made no mention of the allegedly ethic and racial slurs that were allegedly used by the alleged shooter. Those slurs were only made known to the police once CAIR showed up looking to cash in on the victimhood card.
Exactly.
I am waiting for Kerry and Obama to say that the mass murders San Bernardino were “sort of justified” like Kerry said about the first Paris terrorist attack. After all, the Christian coworker provoked the poor Muslim.
As totally messed up as this is, I am actually expecting Liberals to start saying this.
The lame scream mudia is clueless. Likely the shooter was Sunni, and the cabbie was Shiite. Or vice-versa. Once you determine the sect of the perp, the story starts to make more sense.
Sounds to me like a radical muslim shot a “moderate” muslim because he wouldn’t pledge allegiance to ISIS.
Agreed.
What’s aggravating me right now is the way it seems some of the media are setting up the CA narrative so it will read like poor Farook was a double victim - a victim of bullying by his religious zealot co-worker, and a victim of the evil female who “radicalized” him. Clearly no culpability on his part.
BS Machines are set to HIGH on this.
Yup. But we need to bring them back to reality.
And put on your boots!
Mr. Mohamed be hatin' on the muslims. < /sarc >
It's just like when CAIR said that some honor killings by a muslim father were likely a 'hate crime' (before the perp was named).
Yep. I remember hearing the initial reports and then nothing. Even at the time, the shooting sounded suspicious since the passenger went inside to grab his shootin' iron.
I followed an FR link to Buzzfeed and there was an article on this on the sidebar. The headline there omitted the nature of his name.
FBI Investigating Man Who Allegedly Shot A Muslim Taxi Driver After Ranting About ISIS
http://www.buzzfeed.com/tasneemnashrulla/a-passenger-shot-a-muslim-taxi-driver-in-the-back-after-alle#.na8b0r2o7
Anthony Mohamed, 26, was arrested Wednesday and charged with aggravated assault, criminal attempt homicide, and recklessly endangering another person, police told BuzzFeed News.
....
It was from that detail that I searched FR and found this short thread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.