[AEMILIUS PAULUS]

One changes the law through legislation, not through oath breaking. As I told another “jury nullification”fanatic I do not wish to debate, discuss or express different points of view on the claim. Jurors who break their oath should be punished as perjurers. One does not debate one commands such people.

[mlo]

It is a long standing FACT of English and American law that part of the purpose of having juries is to prevent laws being applied unjustly. A jury having the right to judge the law isn't some weird aberration, it's part of the design of the system.

You are the one sounding like a "fanatic", denying this history, saying you won't discuss it (while discussing it), and wanting to command people to abide by your incorrect opinions.