Anyone who can not LEGALLY possess a firearm should not be running around loose.
Expanding on the comment above, I see nothing in the second amendment that excludes freed criminals or crazies from the right to self defense. Anyone who should not be armed should be locked away.
“Anyone who can not LEGALLY possess a firearm should not be running around loose.”
A bumper-sticker response seldom if ever addresses the multifaceted aspects of any issue. I am surprised you posted it.
Lautenberg amendment? Those convicted of misdemeanor battery lose their right to own firearms and are incarcerated for life in your view? Those convicted or admitting to misdemeanor spousal battery regardless of the true circumstances are to be incarcerated for life in your view? They are prohibited from possessing firearms by numerous state laws not to mention the federal restriction regardless of having served their sentences for misdemeanor crimes. Does a conviction for a non-violent “white collar” felony crime justify restricting firearm possession and a loss of other rights and therefore justification for life imprisonment in your view?
It’s just a matter of time before the net closes around us all and reasons are found to prohibit anyone from possessing a firearm due to commission of the new and improved infraction to justify doing so.