Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is excellent news.
1 posted on 11/29/2015 8:12:51 PM PST by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Mariner

> By 2038, the service wants to have 1763 F-35 aircraft in service. However, this procurement schedule might not be financially feasible for the Air Force.

Ain’t gonna happen. It’s going to turn out like the numbers for the F-22.


2 posted on 11/29/2015 8:15:35 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

84 F-15SAs destined for Saudi Arabia

Isis or the Iranians will end up with those if we don’t have a rescue plan for them.


3 posted on 11/29/2015 8:16:44 PM PST by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner
somewhere, PukinDog is laughing...
7 posted on 11/29/2015 8:24:36 PM PST by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - Luke, 22:36)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

F-15 and 16 are far better planes.


8 posted on 11/29/2015 8:26:42 PM PST by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

The Air Force should have pulled the plug on the POS F-35 years ago.


9 posted on 11/29/2015 8:29:38 PM PST by wjcsux ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

“1763 F-35 aircraft in service...”

That will never happen.


12 posted on 11/29/2015 8:33:27 PM PST by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

>>>Boeing previously offered a stealthy “Silent Eagle” version for South Korea’s F-X III fighter competition, but that country last year settled on the Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II for the requirement<<<

South Korea really screwed up with that decision.


16 posted on 11/29/2015 8:37:37 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

Sure be nice to buy some hardware if we’re so intent of starting World War 3 with the Russians.


17 posted on 11/29/2015 8:37:49 PM PST by BobL (Who cares? He's going to build a wall and stop this invasion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

To bad they got rid of the F-14 Tomcat.


20 posted on 11/29/2015 8:40:18 PM PST by American Constitutionalist ( because the Constitution matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

15s backing up 22s is a common sense approach for once.


24 posted on 11/29/2015 9:02:39 PM PST by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

The only thing they should be buying is F22s.

Thousands of them.


26 posted on 11/29/2015 9:14:01 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

Only AFTER we get this anti-American Fascist out of office.


29 posted on 11/29/2015 9:24:16 PM PST by G Larry (ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS impose SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL Immigrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

Excellent news? Why? They’re not built, yet. Who’s going to fly these “planes”? The Muslim Brotherhood?


34 posted on 11/29/2015 9:50:20 PM PST by RedHeeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

The biggest problem with the F-35 is that it was sold as a fighter to replace the F-16 (originally a high maneuverability day fighter) and F/A-18 (grew out of the F-17 dayfighter that lost to the F-16) rather than as a stealthy light-attack successor to the A-7, F-117 and AV-8B.

It’s going to turn out to be a much better platform than people think, when considered as a stealthy light attack plane first, and a fighter somewhere a bit further down the list.


35 posted on 11/29/2015 9:51:04 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

You know the mil buyers and the builders need to re-think everything when it makes more sense to go with a beefed up 40 year old platform over the new design.


47 posted on 11/29/2015 11:59:25 PM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

Buying new build F-16’s is what USAF should have been doing all along. Several evolutionary improvements to the F-16 have been proposed over the years, and USAF always shot them down in their mad chase for an all-stealth fleet.


48 posted on 11/30/2015 12:48:20 AM PST by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

This is excellent news.. for the other aircraft I’d agree.

Not for the American taxpayer, it’s a nightmare when it comes to the F-35. 15 years in developmental test and it’s a pathetic aircraft but like any government program they just keep dumping money into it.


50 posted on 11/30/2015 2:13:05 AM PST by maddog55 (America Rising a new Civil War needs to happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

Did someone wake up somebody in charge at the Air Force!!!


54 posted on 11/30/2015 5:09:59 AM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

This article is garbage. Lockheed won’t sell the F-16 to USAF, it’s foreign customers only. Lockheed has already told the USG repeatedly, “If you wanna buy F-22s or F-35s, great! Wanna buy F-16s? Hit the road, Jack.”


56 posted on 03/29/2016 7:28:28 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson