To: wideawake
No argument with your basic point. The question is how do you minimize the cost?
There is a hard core of addicts who will not get help, who will never shake the monkey on their back. The less we spend on them, the better. Jails are very expensive places, a precious resource if you will. Junkies don’t merit jail unless and until their violent conduct forces the issue.
38 posted on
11/26/2015 1:22:53 PM PST by
RKBA Democrat
(Look closely at any evil and most times you'll find the unmistakable handprint of caesar.)
To: RKBA Democrat
With our current crowd of sue-happy anti-religious malcontents, and widespread skepticism, sometimes help that is worth a dime isn’t even allowed to get near the people who need it.
39 posted on
11/26/2015 1:24:45 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: RKBA Democrat
There is a hard core of addicts who will not get help, who will never shake the monkey on their back. The less we spend on them, the better. Jails are very expensive placesAmen! The less we spend on ANY drug users, addicted or not, the better.
53 posted on
11/27/2015 7:30:10 AM PST by
ConservingFreedom
(a "guest worker" is a stateless person with no ties to any community, only to his paymaster)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson