Replies

“Give examples of his embellishment.”

1) Recent Crime evaluation that 81% of Whites are murdered by blacks. As well as that came from a non-existent company (Crime Statistic Bureau - San Fransisco)

2) Trump and Putin got to know each other very well. An exaggeration. He sat down with Putin for slightly over five minutes total. In a green room. Not a heck of a lot of bonding time.

3) His claim that we are taking in 250,000 refugees. Not even close. 10,000 (which in my mind is 9,999 1/2 too many) is the total over the year.

There are three for you. Again, I wouldn’t say he lies. He exaggerates a truth that is out there. He weaves a great tale. It’s entertaining to watch. I think it is starting to hurt him because he has ramped up his rhetoric and is being called out by almost all news outlets. Let’s face it, when almost all sources gang up on someone, people tend to follow suit. It becomes the “Walks like a Duck. Talks like a duck. Must be a duck.”. Quack.

1) Recent Crime evaluation that 81% of Whites are murdered by blacks. As well as that came from a non-existent company (Crime Statistic Bureau - San Fransisco)

Reading lefty propaganda are we? Did you note that it was a retweet of what others are saying? And did you know the originating tweeter garbled the fake source CSB for the CDC which reported the numbers that Trump retweeted?

Perhaps you can get a paying job with #blacklivesmatter? They are looking for people like you. Because what you parrot comes straight out of their book.

So you read lefty sites and think what they say and twist is truth. Shame on you.

2) Trump and Putin got to know each other very well. An exaggeration. He sat down with Putin for slightly over five minutes total. In a green room. Not a heck of a lot of bonding time.

Again you are parroting lefty talking points. You are revealing who and what you are. Thank you.

3) His claim that we are taking in 250,000 refugees. Not even close. 10,000 (which in my mind is 9,999 1/2 too many) is the total over the year.

And yet again. The reports of internal discussions were of an order of magnitude of 250,000 and that was quickly covered up when it was leaked. But you are quick to discount Trump’s sources. He heard it from reliable people in his inner circle so he didn’t embellish anything. The Obama people were talking to the UN and to others about 250,000. When they saw it leaked and a backlash was forming, they changed it to a much smaller number but you ate it up didn’t you? It’s still 250,000 but the leak is contained.

Did you know that Obama was planning to grant amnesty to as many as 34 Million illegals? Is that a rumor? No, it’s not. It was posted here on FR last year with a reference to a government website and there was no misunderstanding because the order for 34,000,000 security featured hologram cards was described as expected for Obama’s illegal pending immigration reform that was done without Congressional approval. This example shows you that the Obama people don’t do small, they do big as in VERY BIG.

As you see or can sense, I am not impressed with your research skills nor your inference ability.

If you had shown a reputable non-left wing reference like the CDC citing statistics that were completely out of kilter with Donald’s retweet of someone else’s tweet, then I would have joined you in the sentiment that Donald needed to be more careful of who and what he retweeted. But the CDC reported the same statistics. And he retweeted some bad info on Ben Carson but he added that it was disturbing IF TRUE meaning it wasn’t verified. But it gave Carson a chance to rebut the tweet but not before the lefty’s had a celebratory circle jerk of Donald’s ‘lie’ when in fact it was no lie at all but rather a retweet that Donald said was disturbing IF TRUE.

So if you want to be sincere, I suggest you wait to get clear on the facts first. You may need to wait a day or two or three before the lefty lies are exposed.

But for now, you need to do better.