[PhilDragoo]

WHO reporting Trump 25%, Cruz 23%, within the statistical error of the survey.

A concept of Trump as a booster rocket for an otherwise principled but unsuccessful conservative--

--or, in the alternative, a unique alliance of a patriotic entrepreneur and a world-class debater cum regime-buster.

Caught Rush today and the caller who impressed me was a doofus claiming Trump sat at the dinner table with Hillary and Bill and promised to do a Perot.

So much wrong with the premise(s):

Perot was excellent after GHWB's "read my lips" betrayal;

Perot said he pulled out because of Bush, Inc., threats--plausible.

Would Trump rise to the summit and survey the power, then pass the cup to Medusa?

No, and, again, Hell no.

Is there not a potentiation, complementary strength to a Trump-Cruz alliance?

Trump's power comes from expressing the "Mad as Hell" sentiment--no bait and switch does anything to profit him.

Cruz is an enormous tree growing from a modest seed.

They could play Battling Robots and beat each other to spare parts thus giving the Wicked Witch of Chappaqua the title--

--or they could get what destiny has in store:

The complete confounding and humiliation of smug Rovian Patricians and shrieking fairy medioids.

January 20, 2017 is coming.

[LS]

I have done a little research on Perot. He claimed, in the summer when he dropped out, that he did so (and I have the quote someplace on my computer but don’t want to look right ow) because “the Democrats were doing better than expected.” In other words, he wasn’t needed to take out Bush.

[Kaslin]

You are forgetting that President Bush 41 was forced by the rats to renege on his promise not to raise taxes. You might not remember it, but I do.