Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Isara

“President Obama has already announced his intention to veto this bill.”

Go ahead.


2 posted on 11/23/2015 9:22:55 AM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The Antiyuppie

I remember reading about Reagan issuing vetoes he knew would be overridden by congress. He basically said he needed to draw a clear distinction regardless of whether he won or lost.


5 posted on 11/23/2015 9:34:54 AM PST by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: The Antiyuppie
The bill needs to be put forward even if vetoed. It will help republican coattails as the public gets more sickened by the democrat's lack of concern for public safety and national security. Hillary will have this albatross tied around her neck as well as every other democrat running for office. It will not matter if they are running for local dog catcher they will be characterized as terrorist sympathizers, and the democrat party will be known as the party that ISIS supports.

Go Ted GO! Show America that they have been sold out by the establishment and their enablers and then defeat them!

6 posted on 11/23/2015 9:35:30 AM PST by DaveyB (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson