Great essay on a false event. Andy, we do not want JEB!
Except that’s not what Trump says, not saying Muslims. And there’s already a db of incoming Syrians, it just doesn’t have any history and is not used to track them.
btw, db according to gov’t official on Hannity last night.
Hey, Mr. "Journalist", why don't you just ask Mr. Trump what he thinks about Muslim registries? I'd be surprised if he wouldn't take a call or answer an email from someone representing the National Review. Or you could tweet him up.
Being a journalist used to require using some shoe leather. Now you just have to use ten fingers (or two thumbs if you're on your phone) to communicate. Get with the program.
The real blunder is: “ They are already dbase’d” but, won’t be tracked....
I’m sure that Trump was not intending to make major policy decisions during small talk to a reporter asking him a question at a noisy book signing. Unlike McCarty, who has the advantage of sitting in his office and with about twenty-four hours to come up with a whiny hit piece.
I’m surprised McCarthy is anti-Trump.
Geezuss Trump makes more people look stupid than Don Rickles.
When are people going to get this story straight ..???
Rush had Trump’s statement on his program .. and Trump was not talking about registering Muslims .. TRUMP WAS TALKING ABOUT THE BORDER FENCE AND ACCOUNTING FOR THOSE WHO COME ACROSS OUR BORDER.
Trump said NOTHING about putting all Muslims on some sort of registry. TRUMP WAS ALWAYS TALKING ABOUT THE BORDER. IT WAS THE MEDIA INTERVIEWER WHO INTERJECTED THE INFORMATION .. NOT TRUMP.
DAMN IT PEOPLE .. WHEN ARE WE GOING TO LEARN NOT TO TRUST ANYTHING (NOT ANYTHING) THE MEDIA TELLS US - ESPECIALLY ABOUT TRUMP (OR ANY OTHER REPUBLICAN).
Take a breath Andrew. Its another tempest in a teapot. Trump never said he wanted a database of all muslims the reporter suggested it. Trump wanted to talk about immigration. Probably half the people in the US right now think its a good idea anyway. LOL!
Wait til the next terror attack in the US in 3-2-1 any day now. You know its coming. Ofail has brought in hundreds of thousands of these who knows who refugees. Or they waltzed across the border.
: "A national-security investigation may "not [be] conducted solely upon the basis of activities protected by the first amendment to the Constitution." That clause, and others similar to it, are found throughout the Patriot Act and other provisions of federal law. They protect Americans foreign unvetted terrorists from muslim countries from being subjected to surveillance based on nothing except their religious beliefs and uncertain allegiance so clearly demonstrated trough mass murder in England, France, Belgium, Eastern europe and Scandinavian countries.
NO NEED TO PROVE ONE MORE TIME THAT EVERYTHING THAT OBAMA UTTERS HAS ULTIMATELY PROVEN TO BE A LIE. EVERYTHING!
These Obamanation traitors obviously believe that the governors of all our country's states and mayors of our major cities are ignorant total idiots.
Although many might be, I don't buy blanket stupid statements.
How is this vetting taking place?
Details, please.
Governors may be too stupid to care.
Mayors may be too stupid to care.
The American people?
THEY FREAKING CARE!!
The Constitution isn’t a suicide pact.
I sometimes wonder how national review could go any lower, well it just did.
Excellent piece!
Congress needs to find that Islam is not a "religion" within the meaning of the First Amendment.
reminds me of a gun argument we use but they don't care about.
Consider the source. National Review has been on an antiTrump mission from day one. They and the wsj are the journals of record for the gop faction of the uniparty.
This administration has profiled veterans and Christians as potential terrorists yet they refuse to recognize incidents of violence as terrorism when the perpetrators yell Allah Hu Akbar as they shoot the place up.
Go figure.
IMHO