Trump's Muslim-Registry Blunder

National Review ^ | November 21, 2015 | Andrew C. McCarthy

[Lurker]

Andy has a case of the vapors.

L

[USFRIENDINVICTORIA]

Is it safe to assume that there is already a register of all legal immigrants and refugees entering the U.S.A. If not, why not?

[dforest]

Doesn’t matter if there is because Obama would ignore it.

[doosee]

Why waste all of this ink on a reportedly statement. Reportedly from conservative haters, liars, and dishonest knuckleheads.

[jpsb]

The Uniparty is on a mission, destroy Trump. FUUP, go Trump!

[dforest]

Yeah, they know he didn’t say that yet they waste the ink because Trump isn’t establishment.

[UCANSEE2]

I don’t want Muslim immigrants to be registered into a database based on their religion.

I want ALL immigrants to be registered into a database.

Just like all AMERICANS are registered into a database.

[Fungi]

He never said it. Get over it Andrew, I would like to think you can hear correctly.

[acapesket]

If they are so peace loving make them agree to be microchipped in their personal parts prior to entry, see how that goes over.

[ExTexasRedhead]

I just came from a party and in discussing politics everyone I talked to is voting Trump. A dislike of the occupant of our WH was discussed by everyone as well. One woman told me that all her friends, including Democrats, are voting Trump. Surprise, surprise; all this is a Blue state.

[Axenolith]

Islam falls out of that protection (or should) because it’s text AND interpreters unambiguously encourage the killing, persecution and enslavement of non-believers.

Until those passages are renounced and removed by the ideologies major leaders they can not be trusted and can not fall under Constitutional protections.

[Jane Long]

I think Andy’s good friend, Rush, pretty much cleared this up for him, but good....

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/11/20/drive_bys_lie_and_claim_donald_trump_said_register_all_muslims

Oh, National RINO Review, again? No thanks!!

[DJ MacWoW]

A national-security investigation may "not [be] conducted solely upon the basis of activities protected by the first amendment to the Constitution." That clause, and others similar to it, are found throughout the Patriot Act and other provisions of federal law. They protect Americans from being subjected to surveillance based on nothing except their religious beliefs.

Isn't this in direct conflict with immigration law that was posted this week? Did I miss something?

[Flycatcher]

Wow. Even Slate understands Trump's comments were nefariously edited, but National Review pretends otherwise.

Buckley must be spinning in his grave.

FUNR!

[Jane Long]

LOL...Love it!

[ROCKLOBSTER]

I don't want Muslim immigrants to be registered into a database based on their religion.

Me neither, I want them registered because they are members of a violent death-cult ideology, which has declared war on us (Death to America) I also want them watched like a hawk until they can be deported.

[Tupelo]

re: Is it safe to assume that there is already a register of all legal immigrants and refugees entering the U.S.A. If not, why not?

Obama Regime.

[Lisbon1940]

Yup, we got databases. What we need are camps.

[inkfarmer]

Nope. No Trump blunder. He wins again!