Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Turned My Blue State Red? (NYT)
New York Times ^ | November 20, 2015 | By ALEC MacGILLIS

Posted on 11/20/2015 3:06:41 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee

IT is one of the central political puzzles of our time: Parts of the country that depend on the safety-net programs supported by Democrats are increasingly voting for Republicans who favor shredding that net. From Our Advertisers

In his successful bid for the Senate in 2010, the libertarian Rand Paul railed against “intergenerational welfare” and said that “the culture of dependency on government destroys people’s spirits,” yet racked up winning margins in eastern Kentucky, a former Democratic stronghold that is heavily dependent on public benefits. Last year, Paul R. LePage, the fiercely anti-welfare Republican governor of Maine, was re-elected despite a highly erratic first term — with strong support in struggling towns where many rely on public assistance. And earlier this month, Kentucky elected as governor a conservative Republican who had vowed to largely undo the Medicaid expansion that had given the state the country’s largest decrease in the uninsured under Obamacare, with roughly one in 10 residents gaining coverage.

It’s enough to give Democrats the willies as they contemplate a map where the red keeps seeping outward, confining them to ever narrower redoubts of blue. The temptation for coastal liberals is to shake their heads over those godforsaken white-working-class provincials who are voting against their own interests.

But this reaction misses the complexity of the political dynamic that’s taken hold in these parts of the country. It misdiagnoses the Democratic Party’s growing conundrum with working-class white voters. And it also keeps us from fully grasping what’s going on in communities where conditions have deteriorated to the point where researchers have detected alarming trends in their mortality rates.

In eastern Kentucky and other former Democratic bastions that have swung Republican in the past several decades. . .

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: boohoohoo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: Chode

Actually, the networks used to use red for the incumbent party and blue for the challenging party.


21 posted on 11/20/2015 3:49:39 PM PST by FerociousRabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Even people on food stamps don’t won’t to be murdered by those who follow an authentic form of islam just like the originator.


22 posted on 11/20/2015 3:50:24 PM PST by This I Wonder32460 (Ideas have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FerociousRabbit
and what happened to that???
23 posted on 11/20/2015 3:51:31 PM PST by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - Luke, 22:36)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
Maybe people are sick and tired of having their good jobs taken from them and forced into the so called safety net. Democrats create struggling towns where many rely on public assistance. In the mean time, I WANT MY RED STATE BACK!
24 posted on 11/20/2015 3:55:48 PM PST by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
IT'S much the same across the border in eastern Kentucky, which, like southern West Virginia, has been devastated by the collapse of the area's coal industry.

This one sentence really sums it up. Here's how it SHOULD read:

IT'S much the same across the border in eastern Kentucky, which, like southern West Virginia, has been devastated by the deliberate destruction of the area's coal industry by Democrats.

People in these areas get it. Liberal flacks for the New York Times who hold "flyover country" in something between contempt and disdain, don't.
25 posted on 11/20/2015 3:58:10 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
Who Turned My Blue State Red? (NYT)

Those communist bastards who have been living there for the last 100 years. That's who.

26 posted on 11/20/2015 3:59:04 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA
All of the MSM reversed the colors in their 2000 election maps. Probably because they didn’t want the Dems to be identified with the Red commies.

The did it in 1992 because making Clinton "RED" was just too obvious, and would have cost him the election.

They have been doing it ever since then. We all know it's a propaganda technique, but until we are willing to hammer the media corporations into a bloody paste, they are going to keep using their power to push Democrats on the populace.

27 posted on 11/20/2015 4:03:17 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
Meanwhile, many people who in fact most use and need social benefits are simply not voting at all.

Most welfare spending actually goes to fund the welfare bureaucracy, which is given the day off on election day at taxpayer expense. Those are all the votes the Democrats need.

28 posted on 11/20/2015 4:08:36 PM PST by Reeses (A journey of a thousand miles begins with a government pat down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
The temptation for coastal liberals is to shake their heads over those godforsaken white-working-class provincials who are voting against their own interests.

They are finally realizing that welfare statism is not in their best interest in the long run.Libtardism is what is causing the never ending and worsening group warfare in and the decline and decay of the country and impoverishment of the masses and middle class.

29 posted on 11/20/2015 4:19:05 PM PST by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee; All

So then. According to this article, not voting is a good thing for America.

I couldn’t agree more.


30 posted on 11/20/2015 4:25:57 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Look closely at any evil and most times you'll find the unmistakable handprint of caesar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
safety-net programs

Code for "welfare giveaways."

31 posted on 11/20/2015 4:26:52 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
who are voting against their own interests

Because we know better than you what is in your best interest. What an arrogant prick,

32 posted on 11/20/2015 4:33:09 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

“They won’t stay bought, damn it!” :)


33 posted on 11/20/2015 4:34:13 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

34 posted on 11/20/2015 4:36:00 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ADemocratNoMore; Aggie Mama; alarm rider; alexander_busek; AlligatorEyes; AmericanGirlRising; ...
Cherryl Brooks ping.

"Mr. Taggart" -- she jerked her head in a shudder and looked straight at him -- "we were stinking poor and not giving a damn about it. That's what I couldn't take -- that they really give a damn. Not enough to lift a finger. Not enough to empty the garbage pail. And the woman next door saying it was my duty to help them, saying it made no difference what became of me or of her or of any of us, because what could anybody do anyway!"

Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged, Part I, Chapter IX, p. 261

People are beginning to get it. Not enough to scrawl dollar signs on walls in protest, but the light is starting to come on in people's heads. There is something profoundly immoral about our welfare state.

35 posted on 11/20/2015 4:37:12 PM PST by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode

During Bush-Gore all you heard was red state-blue state during the never-ending recounts. The colors that were in place at the time just kind of stuck for all future elections as people just remembered Bush and Republicans = red and Gore and Democrats = blue.


36 posted on 11/20/2015 4:45:23 PM PST by FerociousRabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Who turned the author’s blue state red? That’s easy. Democrats did...by abandoning any semblance of the principles this country was founded upon in favor of the clown freak show that they’ve become and fully embraced.

As it turns out, a good number of people won’t completely sell out and abandon their core beliefs quite so easily.


37 posted on 11/20/2015 4:49:21 PM PST by VOR78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
IT’S much the same across the border in eastern Kentucky, which, like southern West Virginia, has been devastated by the collapse of the area’s coal industry. Eastern Kentucky now shows up on maps as the most benefit-dependent region in the country.

The idiot writer seems unaware that it is Democrat policies that have caused "the collapse of the area's coal industry".

After having her first child as a teenager, marrying young and divorcing, Ms. Dougherty had faced bleak prospects. But she had gotten safety-net support — most crucially, taxpayer-funded tuition breaks to attend community college, where she’d earned her nursing degree.

The idiot writer fails to make a distinction between "safety-net programs" that help people get jobs and "safety-net programs" that allow people to stay at home and watch TV.

Ms. Dougherty wanted a job so she could support herself and her child. I don't mind helping her get a nurse's degree. I DO mind paying Ms Fatstuff to watch As The World Turns.

Why is it that liberals seem totally unaware of these distinctions?

38 posted on 11/20/2015 4:55:17 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: . IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Probably because the rabid Anti-American Leftism of the current crop of Democrat leaders is so obvious that not even the traditionalist “Granddad and Dad were Democrat” crowd can ignore it any longer.


39 posted on 11/20/2015 4:59:41 PM PST by MNJohnnie ( Tyranny, like Hell, is not easily conquered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

the red is the blood the terrorists will shed in the streets of NYC

this time though america will not compassionately send millions of $$$ to people that are anti america


40 posted on 11/20/2015 5:03:57 PM PST by Thibodeaux (this time really is different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson