Posted on 11/20/2015 10:19:27 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
It’s not and never will be. The F22 has half and maybe less of the weapons load.... Ooooooohhh it’s got stealth!!! Which is then defeated with old style radar that the Russians have been mass producing to beat US hocus pocus woo woo bullshit tech that the rest of the world has caught on to. How do you think the f117 was shot down?
The f22 is an air superiority fighter only. It makes little sense to use it in anything but this role considering the f15 kills it in A2G and it’s so expensive it’s simply not worth flying in anything but a specialized mission / role.
The F35 is a turkey and those responsible for the program should be in jail including congress members. As usual, just like with the F4, military planners are planning for wars that never happen and relying on tech that just isn’t and may never be there. Remember when they took the gun off the F4 and relied on missiles that barely worked? It’s that all over again with this bullshit stealth and over reliance on woo tech.
In our current role, we don’t even need the a10. The bronco or the super tucano will do just fine. The A10 is t being fixed anytime ever. It either needs replacement or a new design based on the standards it set for CAS. We have been fighting COIN for 50 years with golden hammers and that needs to stop and the military needs to be flushed of the losers who can’t come to reality and meet current actual needs. Air Force doesn’t like CAS, fire them. Marines insist on VTOL, fire them. It is that simple and it needs to be done. Flush to culture of losers.
The F-15 can STILL defeat anything in the sky except the F-22.
It’s a moot point now that we are stuck with the F-35 for the near future. I’m sure the Powers-That-Be are readying a replacement in the Skunkworks that will be even more expensive and less reliable. Perhaps we should do like they did in WWII, build F-15’s and F-16’s in so many units that they would become almost cheap by the truckload...............
Agree with most of your post, having A-29/OV-10’s makes a great deal of sense in a low threat environment. A few squadrons of these would provide the taxpayer some value and get the job done of putting ordinance on target.
Could be worse—they might elect to buy Mig-35s.
If the design ain't broken, no need to fix it...
Oops.
How could anyone NOT love the F/A-18, a timeless thing of beauty?
If Boeing could put together a 15SE with strengthening and salt proofing it would be a contender against the 35C. I love the 14s but that train has left too long ago.
Sorry, I had just read about them lost right before I saw your comment.
5.56mm
‘Stealth’ is good only until someone figures out a way to see it........................
I’m not a big fan of single engine aircraft (F-35). I would opt for the F-22, but for ‘bang for the buck’ a few F/A-18’s and F-15’s.
The F/A-18 is a new type for the USAF. The F-15/16 have been in service for ages so the USAF and its personnel are very familiar with them and have a well-oiled logistics framework in place. A new type aircraft would have higher costs (esp if the number is likely to be low) and would take longer to induct and put into operation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.