This is copied from my initial reply to you: “I certainly see religion mentioned several times. Though it doesn’t mean a litmus test solely based on religion needs to be applied, there certainly can be and is one if that is the claim being made by the applicant (that they are fleeing because of religious persecution).”
And...
“Also, look at all the Coptic Christians being denied who are legitimately making that exact claim.”
And...
“Regardless, a litmus test is being applied by Obama regarding Copts. He is a liar, a hypocrite and a general DB with regard to his statements towards anyone who disagrees with him.”
Those are the exact things I said, I don’t believe I claimed what you say I did.
Furthermore, what part of the law says we can’t apply a litmus test of any sort? The law just points out guideline within which we can apply the law - it doesn’t say we can’t refuse based on any of those items.
Do you honestly think we should allow anyone in making the claim regardless of what they believe or where they are from because this chunk of federal code says we can consider it?
That is tantamount to what you are arguing here even though you claim otherwise in at least one other post to me.