They aren’t dumb.
They are evil. And driven by the Prince of Lies.
It took me a long time to realize this, but it is entirely a faith and spiritual matter.
Liberal logic.
The baseline of all oxymorons.
This is especially true for the chattering classes, who's legions grow each year with the addition of tens of thousands of new "journalism" and "communications" graduates, all of whom need something to write about.
In fact they live in fear of running out of things to write about.
One hundred years ago, young people who aspired to be "great writers" went abroad to find wars to witness, to find pungent story material on which to build their careers.
Today's nascent Hemingways are too lazy and nihilistic to go abroad to find war. They want the war brought to them.
Leftists wish me dead. That’s all I need to know.
PROGRESSIVE = REPRESSIVE
Liberals have no interest in sharing political power with conservatives, or even considering any perspective but their own. Once they’re in charge, that’s it. They will do anything to keep the status quo intact, including national cultural suicide.
As a native Californian, I’ve seen this up close and personal. Which is why my escape plan is underway. I hate leaving this beautiful state, my home for 62 years, but enough is enough.
As I no longer have hope that sanity will return in my lifetime.
Now we see this same mass retardation playing out on a national level, with Lurch, BamBam, the Hildebeast, and others. And their media watchdogs insure that they’re never held responsible for the train wrecks of their creation.
It’s always been up to us to keep our country on track, now more than ever. This next general election is make or break. If we can’t overcome the continued infestation by the left, with their despicable tactics, we’re doomed.
Liberal logic has to do with logically bringing about the revolution by being illogical.
IMHO
Here is a global example of the flawed liberal logic.
We pass laws because we cannot trust the people, but we trust the people to obey the laws we pass.
The other day I found myself very puzzled. I know what I believe, why I believe it, the philosophical foundations of my beliefs. I've studied everything from Karl Marx to Ludwig von Mises, from Friedrich Hayek to FDR, from Edmund Burke to Bertrand Russell, from Aristotle to Ayn Rand.
I understand modern conservative thought. I understand libertarian thought. I understand classical liberalism.
What I can't begin to comprehend is modern liberalism. Maybe you can help me.
As near as I can tell, to be a liberal:
You have to believe that the lack of funding spreads AIDS.
You have to believe that only churches pre-approved by the government are valid.
You have to be against capital punishment but for abortion on demand... in short, you support protecting the guilty and killing the innocent.
You have to believe that the same public school system who can't teach 4th graders how to read is qualified to teach those same kids about sex.
You have to believe that trial lawyers are selfless heroes and doctors are overpaid.
You have to believe that guns in the hands of law-abiding Americans are more of a threat than nuclear weapons in the hands of the Red Chinese.
You have to believe that global temperatures are affected less by cyclical, documented changes in the brilliance of the Sun and affected more by yuppies driving SUVs.
You have to believe that sexual roles are artificial but being gay is natural.
You have to believe that businesses create oppression and governments create prosperity.
You have to believe that self-esteem is more important than actually doing something to earn it.
You have to believe there was no art before federal funding.
You have to believe the military, not corrupt politicians, start wars.
You have to believe the free market that gives us 500+ channels can't deliver the quality that PBS does.
You have to believe the NRA is bad, because they stand up for certain parts of the Constitution, while the ACLU is good, because they stand up for certain parts of the Constitution.
You have to believe that taxes are too low but ATM fees are too high.
You have to believe that Harriet Tubman, Cesar Chavez and Gloria Steinem are more important to American history than Thomas Jefferson, General Robert E. Lee or Thomas Edison.
You have to believe that standardized tests are racist, but racial quotas and set-asides aren't.
You have to believe second-hand smoke is more dangerous than HIV.
You have to believe conservatives are racists but that black people couldn't make it without liberal help.
You have to believe that the only reason socialism hasn't worked anywhere it's been tried is because the right people haven't been in charge.
Looking back on my list, it seems shallow, muddled, contradictory, divorced of logic and a bit sadistic.
Well, then.
If that doesn't describe the modern liberal, I don't know what does.
I would add several others, among them:
You have to believe that Socialists are good for the America political process, but marginalized Evangelical Christians can't participate.
What would you add to the definition of modern liberalism not covered? Or, how would you improve on the definitions given?
Liberal Logic= Oxymoron
I see it everyday....even here.