Skip to comments.
‘Son of Concorde’ gets the go ahead: Craft that can go from London to New York in THREE HOURS
DAILYMAIL.COM ^
| 17 November 2015
| ELLIE ZOLFAGHARIFARD
Posted on 11/19/2015 4:32:00 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last

The world's first private supersonic jet could take off in as little as six years. The AS2 plane will be capable of supersonic travel, allowing passengers to travel between London and New York in just four hours, and Los Angeles to Tokyo in six
More pix at source
To: sukhoi-30mki
Reminds me of a century, like an F 104.
2
posted on
11/19/2015 4:34:47 AM PST
by
Daniel Ramsey
(Trump to win! He wins, we win, the nation wins!)
To: sukhoi-30mki
If only Boeing had proceeded with their proposed SST (Boeing 2707), that magnificent plane had a projected cruising speed of
2900 mph, what a plane!
3
posted on
11/19/2015 4:38:25 AM PST
by
mkjessup
(Trump & Cruz are the ONLY candidates to which we can trust America's security.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Good morning.
“ZOLFAGHARIFARD”
I don’t believe it.
5.56mm
4
posted on
11/19/2015 4:38:30 AM PST
by
M Kehoe
To: sukhoi-30mki
It may be my advanced age, and you may certainly call me regressed, but I prefer the relaxed pace, luxurious amenities, and cordial social interaction of a comfy cruise ship.
To: M Kehoe
âZOLFAGHARIFARDâ
I donât believe it.
She doesn't seem to be guilty of anything.
6
posted on
11/19/2015 4:45:35 AM PST
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics)
To: sukhoi-30mki
But will it pass Obama's "eco friendly" test?

Supersonic Concorde
First flight: 2 March 1969
Introduction: 21 January 1976
Fuel Burn Rate: 26,400 gallons /119,500 ltrs / 95,680 kgs
Fuel Consumption (at Idle Power) 1100 kgs/hr (302 Gallons/hr)
7
posted on
11/19/2015 4:47:01 AM PST
by
NYer
(Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy them. Mt 6:19)
To: Dr. Sivana
You’re right, not guilty.
5.56mm
8
posted on
11/19/2015 4:51:03 AM PST
by
M Kehoe
To: sukhoi-30mki

Come, Concorde!
9
posted on
11/19/2015 4:52:26 AM PST
by
uglybiker
(nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-BATMAN!)
To: sukhoi-30mki
I think it's likely the plane will have a top speed of Mach 1.6.
There's good reasons for this:
1. You don't need to run the engine with constant afterburner so much, and that dramatically reduces fuel consumption.
2. The new engines can run in the same supercruise mode that the engine on the F-22A Raptor does for most of its supersonic flight regime, and that reduces fuel consumption even further.
3. Limiting it to Mach 1.6 means far less need for expensive stainless steel or titanium structural components. In fact, it makes it possible to use a lot more composite structural materials, an additional factor in lowering fuel consumption.
4. Limiting the top speed to Mach 1.6 also means easier design to shape to plane to eliminate the pressure wave buildup that causes the sonic boom in the first place.
10
posted on
11/19/2015 4:52:51 AM PST
by
RayChuang88
(FairTax: America's economic cure)
To: mkjessup
If only Boeing had proceeded with their proposed SST (Boeing 2707), that magnificent plane had a projected cruising speed of 2900 mph, what a plane!
2707 SST had a projected cruise speed of 2900 km/h, not 2900 mph. Still, that's 1800 mph - three times faster than today's jetliners.
To: sukhoi-30mki
too bad the government will make you wait in security for an additional 3 hours!
12
posted on
11/19/2015 5:05:34 AM PST
by
TexasFreeper2009
(You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, & R)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Reminds me of the Pan-Am space liner from 2001: A Space Odyssey.
CC
13
posted on
11/19/2015 5:10:58 AM PST
by
Celtic Conservative
(CC: purveyor of cryptic, snarky posts since December, 2000..)
To: Daniel Ramsey
The stubby wings and the T-tail do remind me of the Starfighter, now that you mention it.
To: uglybiker
Dennis Moore, Dennis Moore riding through the land.
Great sketch.
15
posted on
11/19/2015 5:19:04 AM PST
by
wally_bert
(I didn't get where I am today by selling ice cream tasting of bookends, pumice stone & West Germany)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Looks like an F-104 Starfighter, on steroids
16
posted on
11/19/2015 5:22:05 AM PST
by
JRios1968
(I'm guttery and trashy, with a hint of lemon. - Laz)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Hope this is not another paper airplane and they actually bend some metal to make one.
17
posted on
11/19/2015 5:22:28 AM PST
by
r_barton
To: sukhoi-30mki
“and a luxurious 30ft-long cabin that will seat up to 12 passengers. “
—
12 passengers?
12 passengers?
It’s a private plane, basically. Very expensive.
To: HartleyMBaldwin
The stubby wings and the T-tail do remind me of the Starfighter Thought of the F-104 myself as soon as I saw the picture :D
19
posted on
11/19/2015 5:25:36 AM PST
by
Wilum
(Never loaded a nuke I didn't like)
To: Celtic Conservative
2001 is probably my all time fav movie...
20
posted on
11/19/2015 5:26:07 AM PST
by
newfreep
(TRUMP/Cruz 2016 - "Evil succeeds when good men do nothing" - Edmund Burke)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson