Why not keep them open and spy on them aggressively?
Why not?
The real reason is that although the terrorist numbers may be 1 in 100 or 1000 for that matter, a mosque provides a safe zone for terrorist’s to operate and a higher comfort level.
Until the Mosque’s start actively policing their own they have to go.
Why not keep them open and spy on them aggressively?
This. I believe in our Constitution.
Scientology is allowed, Brotherhood of Islam is allowed. Of course mosques should be allowed but any strong suspicion of terrorism being planned there, and a mosque needs to be opened to law enforcement.
Why not keep them open and spy on them aggressively?
………
Actually a much better solution. Donald are you listening?
Trump 2016.
We are already doing that.
Are you comfortable with that? Do you feel secure?
At the airport the other day there was a big police presence along with bomb sniffing dogs. Cars were being searched. There were Muslims working all over the airport, even in TSA. I don't like living like that just to keep some Muslims happy.
How did that work out in Boston?
“Why not keep them open and spy on them aggressively?”
yeah, that’s the better plan. At least that way you know where to look. Issue a public EO prohibiting spying on religious institutions and then issue a classified EO countermanding that one and giving the go-ahead.
Because on another thread today,,,..a former FBI guy said it costs $600,000 a year for 24/7 surveillance on a single individual.
Because on another thread today,,,..a former FBI guy said it costs $600,000 a year for 24/7 surveillance on a single individual.
You can bet Mossad is doing just that.....but damnit, we have a Prez who hates Israel.....and Israel knows it.