Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Why Obama chose TODAY, after 18 months of bombings, to go after ISIS's Oil trucks, suddenly becomes VERY CLEAR, doesn't it?
1 posted on 11/16/2015 9:19:39 PM PST by tcrlaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: tcrlaf

Well... Obama did say he was transparent.


2 posted on 11/16/2015 9:24:47 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

I think you could end the ISIS war machine in thirty days, without dropping a single bomb.

Go ID all funding that goes toward the ISIS machine. Once you establish the charities or businessmen involved...start stealing their money...ALL of it. Move it into an account and tell the individuals involved that they can have their money back after ten years of non-existence of ISIS is noted.

Touch every single individual....no matter who they are or how little they gave to ISIS. They apparently can’t handle wealth....so they don’t need the money (any of it).

My guess is no member of the Senate will dare agree with this because they themselves get campaign funding from the same people. That’s the root of this entire problem.


3 posted on 11/16/2015 9:28:55 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

I read the article, and it did not name names. Is Putin threatening to reveal names in order to pressure other nations?


5 posted on 11/16/2015 9:58:32 PM PST by matt1234 (Note to GOPe lurkers: I and thousands like me will NEVER vote for Jeb Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

No wonder Obama was so testy today - his boys are really going to get hit where they live.

If the oil tankers come to a halt, it is going to cause massive problems for ISIS.

If the funders of ISIS are exposed it will include the Saudi Government and some of the world’s richest men - who have been buying off Western politicians as well.

Those corrupt politicians in turn use their public treasuries to further support ISIS (though not directly or openly). Obama, Erdogan, probably Hollande (although the Russians will probably not expose that if he gets on the right side now).


8 posted on 11/16/2015 10:08:51 PM PST by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

My spousal unit and I both have been saying lately that Pooty Poot has been making more sense than our own leaders. Scary.


11 posted on 11/16/2015 10:26:23 PM PST by llevrok (To liberals, Treason Is the New Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

Putin needs to publish the list.


13 posted on 11/16/2015 10:45:39 PM PST by Cowboy Bob (With Trump & Cruz, America can't lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

I saw a report on the the oil tanker strike - it only took a few planes (4 ea. A-10s, 2 ea. AC-130s), to destroy over 100 oil tankers. Apparently, hundreds are clustered at the same spot every day waiting to load. Like fish in a barrel.

That article estimated that about a thousand trucks were involved in the trade, so at that rate, they could shut it down almost immediately. Hit it again tomorrow, and few will show up to work the next day. Hit them for a week anywhere they are seen, and there won’t be enough left to go back to work, even if they wanted to.

Without any fuel supply, trucks stop running, and food stops being delivered - total collapse in a couple of weeks, probably with unacceptable civilian impact.

Without the money from oil sales, they could get by for a while on credit and theft, but fighters might not be paid at the end of the month. Foreign sponsors would have to ramp up their spending.

If we had really tried to crush ISIS, they would have been crushed long ago. Before Paris. Before the next one.


20 posted on 11/17/2015 1:42:56 AM PST by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf
IS conflict: US-led air strikes 'destroy 116 IS oil trucks'. It's just a coincidence.
23 posted on 11/17/2015 2:14:56 AM PST by McGruff (Trump-Cruz 2016. Make America Great Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf
They call themselves ISIS (Iraq, Syria).

The "L" in ISIL means "Levant" - and it is Obama's signal to attack and destroy Isreal by proxy.


24 posted on 11/17/2015 3:01:31 AM PST by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf
Suddenly targeting oil trucks (though giving heads-ups and dropping leaflets, apparently to let personnel fight another day) combined with his bizarre, flailing speech does make it seem as if Obama got the wind put up him something fierce. It may have been Vlad or one of Barky's Muslim handlers who did it, but the timing and the photos (as well as the lame-azzed White House spin on them) along with news like this make me think it was the former.

I too am fairly convinced that if the PTB wanted ISIS/ISIL/DAESH rendered impotent, it could be done so through the money spigot.

Mr. niteowl77

26 posted on 11/17/2015 4:13:38 AM PST by niteowl77 ("The truth is that this thing is not worth fixing up anymore.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson