[AmericanVictory]

State court rulings are not binding precedent on a federal question. And it remains the case that presidential eligibility was not at issue in Wong Kim Ark so that it too would not be binding precedent. Why don't we just wait and see.

[4Zoltan]

I never said that the lower court rulings were binding precedent. But I am saying that these lower court judges consider Wong Kim Ark to be binding precedent on them.