I have no idea what DiogeneseLamp means when he talks about me supporting natural law for slavery. I think he's just being puzzle-headed again.
It has become increasingly apparent to me that you have trouble understanding anything I say. Again, this is because you are ill suited to engage in this discussion.
If you carefully read what I wrote, you will notice it says nothing about supporting natural law for slavery. I am saying that slavery is contradictory to natural law and you ought to know that in your heart.
Remember that Declaration of Independence thing? Remember how Thomas Jefferson deliberately put that "all men are created equal" line in there? He was asserting natural law when he did that, though it was then in grave contradiction to then existing common and statutory law.
Slavery is contrary to natural law. I can not make it any simpler for you.