[DiogenesLamp]

And as I said before, in order to identify those who can become citizens only through naturalization Congress needs to identify those who are natural-born citizens. It's common sense.

No it isn't. It is backward's logic. You are attempting to define something by what it isn't.

Your argument is "That because something is not this, it must therefore be that."

No. Just because a cow is not a chicken, that does not mean a squirrel must be a chicken.

[DoodleDawg]

No it isn't. It is backward's logic. You are attempting to define something by what it isn't.

OK so let's take this one step at a time and see if we can unravel your twisted logic. Who does not need to be naturalized in order to become a citizen?