Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS

You’re probably right (although I now think that Iraq was a big debacle- from start to finish). That said, the best piece of evidence to support your comment, that (i.e. going into Iraq....i.e. the Hornet’s nest) is that other than London and Madrid, the U.S. didn’t have any major attacks after 9/11. Still, the main problem was that Bush, like so many of his surrogates (then or now) never really explained it, and still don’t, to the public nor asked Congress for a Declaration of War (as per the Constitution)!! To make matters worst- instead of asking the public at large to fully sacrifice... he told them to go shopping and to pay for the “War” he cut taxes! (I’m 100% for cutting taxes...during PEACE time)That’s why many people lump Bush and Obama as the same in the sense of their total incompetences!!!


177 posted on 11/16/2015 11:06:26 AM PST by freddy005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: freddy005
Yes. Big drawback. Although better than Vietnam, the Iraq War was never framed in the proper propaganda structure (and, yes, propaganda IS important for war in a democracy because Americans don't want to go to war as a rule).

Bush and Rumsfeld allowed themselves to be outflanked in the media, rather than staying on the attack all the time.

179 posted on 11/16/2015 11:22:32 AM PST by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson