Posted on 11/13/2015 9:49:24 PM PST by LSUfan
Might be time for the French to get their Charlemagne on.
All responsibility is on Obama, this pos, for everything and the terrorist attacks in the world. The terror in France is only America’s fault, the worst foreign policy and of NATO. Europe, you better listen to Putin than those pos in the US.
Will go down with the words, ‘peace in our time’.
I would think they will perform some relocation actions in Calais.
Abd the Brits will have mines and machine guns on the other side of the Chunnel.
Nothing is going to interfere with the golf games and the caviar dinners with champagne. You can whistle Dixie until the cows come home and nothing will interfere.
There is nothing in the Treaty that declares that NATO cannot pursue non-state actors. The US invoked the North Atlantic treaty to go after AQ in Afghanistan. NATO answered that call. Some NATO countries chose not to participate in operations beyond those designed to target the Jihadists in Afghanistan.
Before you refer to something as “nonsense,” you best have at least a tad of knowledge at your disposal.
What pisses me off is I see all these people on f$);/&sing Facebook to pray for Paris. Europe ditched Christ along time ago. Secondly, these open minded people sealed there date when they let these monsters one in by the thousands. It’s time for a Crusade against Islam. We have not even gotten serious yet. You think they would be able to do this in the 1940’s?
One of the first things I said last night, “trot James Taylor out, singing you’ve got a friend, and all will be forgiven”
Those zones are beyond being just a police problem. Send the French Foreign Legion into those zones. Do it now, and do it often. See how long those zones remain "no go".
France must act, decisively, today.
Yes, but it was the secularizing Ataturk who abolished the Caliphate after the Allies were unwilling to fight for their partition rights in Anatolia and what became European Turkey. The Allies would have been wiser to allow the old Sultan to move to Damascus or inside the the French mandate or Baghdad in the British mandate and remain as Caliph. A tame Caliph would have been very beneficial and would have prevented Sunni Islam from becoming the hotbed of lunacy it became beginning in the 1920's.
And, until the New Turks with their modern-style Turkish nationalism got sway at the Sublime Porte (cf. the history of the Armenian genocide), the old Caliphs had been letting their Islamic state change in increasingly human ways: abolishing slavery, abolishing dhimmitude and making all citizens of the Empire formally equal before the law, regardless of religion (a concession for French and British support in the Crimean War), establishing a parliamentary constitution,...
Nothing to see here folks.... move along.
France has to go to NATO and assert that.
It is not automatic.
No sure if NATO is necessary.
I’ve seen the FFL. Not sure I would want them knocking on my door.
” Sounds like a job for John Kerry,
He speaks French and knows what all the best wines are. “
Prison is too good for Kerry
and Obama
and Hillary.
I wouldn’t say “all” that was missing was sufficient self-will, but I don’t see how one could argue that wasn’t a contributing factor in the Paris attacks. Look at how Parisians dealt with their Muslim “problem”. They basically put them in no go zones and said “that’s that problem solved”.
They never put any real curtail on their actions in country, nor really monitored the goings on in such zones (obviously) and they (didn’t do) any of this largely because of “political correctness”. It’s un-PC to do or say anything negative about Islam so they only contained the issue in the unspoken no go zones. It was only a matter of time before such an ineffectual strategy backfired.
It’s only a matter of time before something similar happens here for the same, large reason. We need to overcome this reactive approach dictated by “political correctness”. We need to be more pro-active in neutralizing threats. (Like extremist Islamics or leftists). In other words we need more “self-will”: more dedication to what’s right and the fortitude to see it through to the end.
I think Norm’s “cage” approach is too extreme but I’d wager he’s not suggesting taking it completely literally. He told me when I asked about it that he was/is “half-joking” with it. So I don’t see anything wrong with the concept, as an educational tool at least.
If the world woke up one day and said “Today we make Normie our King!”, I literally would put liberals in cages and have no guilt in doing it. They are responsible for nearly all the things bad in this world from crime, to the spreading of disease, to abuse and on down the line. They empower the terror types and cause starvation and misery.
That said, I realize that isn’t going to happen.
Since it won’t happen, “Cages” can be traditional jail after a trial. It can be penal colonies. It can be anything that removes liberals from control, power and authority and influence.
By their daily actions across the board they show they are insane, power-mad subhumans no more fit to live amongst civilized people than an ISIS jihadist. They created ISIS jihadists. to fulfill their evil ends.
Liberals are the personification of evil. This isn’t me saying it. It is their actions showing it. They SHOULD be eradicated. But since evil will always return anew , the best we can do is contain it. Whatever ‘cage’ that takes, we should employ without remorse or regret.
I readily admit it’s ‘extreme’. Their evil is likewise extreme. One doesn’t bring knives to gunfights expecting to win. Nor should we forget the words of the founders who were known for some extreme thinking when dealing with evil themselves.
“Extremism in pursuit of liberty is no vice”.
Agreed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.